2016 13th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Video and Signal Based Surveillance (AVSS) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/avss.2016.7738059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Online multi-person tracking using Integral Channel Features

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The GRU is parameterized by matrices W z , W r and W with dimension d×N and matrices U z , U r and U with dimension d × d. z t in Equation (8) is regarded as the update gate, which decides the degree of update the GRU performs. r t in Equation (9) is called the reset gate, which decides how much information from the previous time step should be forgotten.h t in Equation (10) is known as the candidate activation, which is used to compute the new hidden state in Equation (11). In training, the parameters of the GRU are learned in order to update its hidden state in an appropriate way.…”
Section: Recurrent Autoregressive Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GRU is parameterized by matrices W z , W r and W with dimension d×N and matrices U z , U r and U with dimension d × d. z t in Equation (8) is regarded as the update gate, which decides the degree of update the GRU performs. r t in Equation (9) is called the reset gate, which decides how much information from the previous time step should be forgotten.h t in Equation (10) is known as the candidate activation, which is used to compute the new hidden state in Equation (11). In training, the parameters of the GRU are learned in order to update its hidden state in an appropriate way.…”
Section: Recurrent Autoregressive Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compare our INARLA tracker with nine recent online MPT methods that published their results on the 2D MOT 2015 benchmark, including TSDA OAL [43], RNN LSTM [31], OMT DFH [44], EAMTTpub [45], oICF [46], SCEA [24], MDP [30], DCCRF [47] and AM [48]. Among them, RNN LSTM, DCCRF and AM are deep learning-based methods.…”
Section: Benchmark Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before calculating the appearance affinity, we create shape and motion affinity matrices using Eq. 2: 7) where N is the total number of object(X) or observation(Z). Then, we calculate the final affinity matrix as:…”
Section: Gating Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been many works [2,1,7,10,8] which tried to derive accurate appearance affinity. Several works [2,7] tried to design appearance model without using deep neural network(DNN). Those trackers achieved better performance but couldn't significantly improve the performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%