2008
DOI: 10.1109/tits.2008.915649
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Online Learning Solutions for Freeway Travel Time Prediction

Abstract: Abstract-Providing travel time information to travelers on available route alternatives in traffic networks is widely believed to yield positive effects on individual drive behavior and (route/departure time) choice behavior, as well as on collective traffic operations in terms of, for example, overall time savings and-if nothing else-on the reliability of travel times. As such, there is an increasing need for fast and reliable online travel time prediction models. Previous research showed that data-driven app… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
53
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 171 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These methods can be broadly classified in two major categories; parametric methods (e.g. linear regression (Zhang and Rice, 2003), time series models (Yang, 2005;Min and Wynter, 2011), Kalman filtering (Okutani and Stephanedes, 1984;Van Lint, 2008)) and non-parametric methods (neural network models (Ledoux, 1997;Vlahogianni et al, 2005;Van Lint, 2006), support vector regression (Vanajakshi and Rilett, 2007), simulation models (Liu et al, 2006)). In the past years, neural network models have gained attention in transportation field and are frequently applied in traffic state prediction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods can be broadly classified in two major categories; parametric methods (e.g. linear regression (Zhang and Rice, 2003), time series models (Yang, 2005;Min and Wynter, 2011), Kalman filtering (Okutani and Stephanedes, 1984;Van Lint, 2008)) and non-parametric methods (neural network models (Ledoux, 1997;Vlahogianni et al, 2005;Van Lint, 2006), support vector regression (Vanajakshi and Rilett, 2007), simulation models (Liu et al, 2006)). In the past years, neural network models have gained attention in transportation field and are frequently applied in traffic state prediction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 2.1 illustrates the factors influencing variations in travel time. Some studies addressed major sources of large variability in travel time including traffic incidents, work zones, adverse weather, traffic control, special events, road geometry and fluctuation in normal traffic (Cambridge Systematics Inc. and Texas Transportation Institute, 2005;Emam and Al-Deek, 2006;Hendren et al, 2006;Van Lint et al, 2008;Transportation Research Board, 2009). Factors causing fluctuations in either demand or supply might have inter-relationships and are not independent.…”
Section: Factors Affecting Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various types of travel time models have been developed for the purpose of estimating and predicting travel time and, consequently, estimating variability of travel time (Zhang and Rice, 2003;Van Lint, 2004;Jiann-Shiou, 2005;Li, 2006;Liu et al, 2006;You and Kim, 2007;Van Lint, 2008;Fei et al, 2011).…”
Section: Travel Time Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later, a dynamic route guidance system (DRGS) [74] was proposed for estimating and predicting travel time and then weighted to get optimal routes. In order to further improve the performance of the prediction model, researchers have applied various techniques to this problem such as Bayesian framework [75], Linear regression [76], Kalman filtering [77], neural networks [78], and kernel estimator [79].…”
Section: B Traffic Flow Forecastingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1973, Messer, Dudek and Friebele [73] announced the possibility of time prediction in their work. After that, many researchers [75][76][77][78][79] have concentrated their efforts on improving the accuracy of the predicted time. [61,62].…”
Section: B Prediction Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%