2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jradnu.2022.08.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Online Learning in Nigerian Universities During COVID-19 Pandemic: The Experiences of Nursing and Radiography Undergraduate Students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When we consider the level of engagement of students in the online learning process, Binali, Tsai and Chang (2021) revealed five types of learners: Highly engaged, self-driven online contributors (with a share of approximately 34% of their recipients), Moderately engaged, self-driven online viewers (12.3% of the sample), Less engaged, self-driven online learners (15.17%); Highly engaged, course-driven online learners (23.39%) and Less involved, course-driven online learners (15,43%). Specific research for the transformation from classical to online learning shows the following exciting finding, which is in total coherence with the already presented results: the changed conditions of the learning environment influenced social interaction in negative ways, but also that team reflection seemed to enable the students to reverse some of the adverse effects and develop practices that supported both the cognitive and socio-emotional dimensions of social interaction (Sjølie, Espenes & Buø, 2022 with lecturers and peers, and no access to a computer device (Ogolodom et al, 2022). An exciting finding after a discriminant analysis made by Al-Nasa'h, Al-Tarawneh, Awwad and Ahmad (2021) revealed the following: High online learning satisfaction levels occurred with high online self-efficacy, moderate general anxiety, and low fear of .…”
Section: Literature Reviewsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…When we consider the level of engagement of students in the online learning process, Binali, Tsai and Chang (2021) revealed five types of learners: Highly engaged, self-driven online contributors (with a share of approximately 34% of their recipients), Moderately engaged, self-driven online viewers (12.3% of the sample), Less engaged, self-driven online learners (15.17%); Highly engaged, course-driven online learners (23.39%) and Less involved, course-driven online learners (15,43%). Specific research for the transformation from classical to online learning shows the following exciting finding, which is in total coherence with the already presented results: the changed conditions of the learning environment influenced social interaction in negative ways, but also that team reflection seemed to enable the students to reverse some of the adverse effects and develop practices that supported both the cognitive and socio-emotional dimensions of social interaction (Sjølie, Espenes & Buø, 2022 with lecturers and peers, and no access to a computer device (Ogolodom et al, 2022). An exciting finding after a discriminant analysis made by Al-Nasa'h, Al-Tarawneh, Awwad and Ahmad (2021) revealed the following: High online learning satisfaction levels occurred with high online self-efficacy, moderate general anxiety, and low fear of .…”
Section: Literature Reviewsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Virus SARS-CoV-2 yang terus bermutasi, menyebabkan aktivitas perkantoran dan pendidikan dilakukan secara daring (Ogolodom et al, 2022). Perubahan pola bekerja dari luring menjadi daring secara tiba-tiba dapat mempengaruhi kesehatan mental masyarakat.…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…It is also commonly believed that private practitioners may have difficulty adhering to certain ethical codes in the process of managing their patients. 29 Moreover, there are also the ethical issues of commercializing the entire process or the possibility of violating the reporting codes of the treatment procedures, which could create gaps in information sharing between the private practitioners and the regulators. For instance, the family of a rich patient who may not want to make public the family member's status because of the stigma that it may bring may induce the private health care establishment to falsify or manipulate the records.…”
Section: Regulation and Ethical Issues Concerning Private Healthcare ...mentioning
confidence: 99%