“…When we consider the level of engagement of students in the online learning process, Binali, Tsai and Chang (2021) revealed five types of learners: Highly engaged, self-driven online contributors (with a share of approximately 34% of their recipients), Moderately engaged, self-driven online viewers (12.3% of the sample), Less engaged, self-driven online learners (15.17%); Highly engaged, course-driven online learners (23.39%) and Less involved, course-driven online learners (15,43%). Specific research for the transformation from classical to online learning shows the following exciting finding, which is in total coherence with the already presented results: the changed conditions of the learning environment influenced social interaction in negative ways, but also that team reflection seemed to enable the students to reverse some of the adverse effects and develop practices that supported both the cognitive and socio-emotional dimensions of social interaction (Sjølie, Espenes & Buø, 2022 with lecturers and peers, and no access to a computer device (Ogolodom et al, 2022). An exciting finding after a discriminant analysis made by Al-Nasa'h, Al-Tarawneh, Awwad and Ahmad (2021) revealed the following: High online learning satisfaction levels occurred with high online self-efficacy, moderate general anxiety, and low fear of .…”