2013
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1302.6927
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Online Learning for Time Series Prediction

Abstract: In this paper we address the problem of predicting a time series using the ARMA (autoregressive moving average) model, under minimal assumptions on the noise terms. Using regret minimization techniques, we develop effective online learning algorithms for the prediction problem, without assuming that the noise terms are Gaussian, identically distributed or even independent. Furthermore, we show that our algorithm's performances asymptotically approaches the performance of the best ARMA model in hindsight.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For simplicity, our exposition was limited to the case of noise-free observations (translating to noise-free loss observations). Fortunately however, there exist a variety of online convex programming algorithms that address noisy losses [12,5,4,2] the offer expected regret bounds that can be converted into high-probability bounds. If we applied those, all our results presented in this paper would hold with arbitrarily high probability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For simplicity, our exposition was limited to the case of noise-free observations (translating to noise-free loss observations). Fortunately however, there exist a variety of online convex programming algorithms that address noisy losses [12,5,4,2] the offer expected regret bounds that can be converted into high-probability bounds. If we applied those, all our results presented in this paper would hold with arbitrarily high probability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No-regret bounds and algorithms have been studied and deployed in a great many online learning scenarios, including, among others, time-series prediction in ARMA models [2], multi-agent coordination [9], game-theory [14,6,21]. For a classic text book, the reader is referred to [11], whereas a recent survey can be found in [18].…”
Section: Contractive Dynamical Systems With Increasingly Permanently ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A wide range of time series prediction methods [Anava et al, 2013] are in effect realizations of Gaussian processes that correspond to specific choices of a covariance function [Rasmussen et al, 2007]. Classic methods, including autoregressive and moving average methods and their various combinations and extensions, e.g., the well-known Box-Jenkins methods, are such in-effect realizations, as are various spline methods, e.g., smoothing and B-splines [Brockwell, et al 2009]. However, spaghetti prediction is not a realization of a Gaussian process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exponential weighting has also been investigated in the case of weakly dependent stationary data in Alquier and Wintenberger (2012). More recently, an approach inspired from individual sequences prediction has been studied in Anava et al (2013) for bounded ARMA processes under some specific conditions on the (constant) ARMA coefficients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%