2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2015.08.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Online heat flux estimation using artificial neural network as a digital filter approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As the baseflow cannot be directly observed, foreign researchers have proposed various baseflow splitting methods, such as the direct splitting method, water balance method, numerical simulation method and hydrological modeling method, based on the difference in confluence between the steep rise and fall of surface runoff and the slow rise and fall of subsurface runoff. Among them, the direct splitting method is highly subjective, workload and not suitable for long time-scale baseflow splitting; the water balance method has more parameters, complex formulas and difficult to optimize; the hydrological modeling method has clear physical meaning and high credibility, but requires more parameters and extremely complex operation; and the numerical simulation method is highly efficient, repeatable and widely used in current research (Hao et al 2019), mainly including the digital filtering method (Hamidreza & Keith 2015), the hydrograph separation program (HYSEP) (Gardner et al 2010) and the minimum smoothing method (Bastola et al 2018).…”
Section: Methodology Base Flow Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the baseflow cannot be directly observed, foreign researchers have proposed various baseflow splitting methods, such as the direct splitting method, water balance method, numerical simulation method and hydrological modeling method, based on the difference in confluence between the steep rise and fall of surface runoff and the slow rise and fall of subsurface runoff. Among them, the direct splitting method is highly subjective, workload and not suitable for long time-scale baseflow splitting; the water balance method has more parameters, complex formulas and difficult to optimize; the hydrological modeling method has clear physical meaning and high credibility, but requires more parameters and extremely complex operation; and the numerical simulation method is highly efficient, repeatable and widely used in current research (Hao et al 2019), mainly including the digital filtering method (Hamidreza & Keith 2015), the hydrograph separation program (HYSEP) (Gardner et al 2010) and the minimum smoothing method (Bastola et al 2018).…”
Section: Methodology Base Flow Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They proposed that a combination of both algorithms would improve the results. Najafi and Woodbury 176 used neural networks to estimate the heat flux at the surface of a material using temperature information, and then they also discussed their limitations and benefits.…”
Section: Parameter Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sadeghi-Goughari et al (2016) applied the artificial neural network (ANN) to identify the brain tumors parameters by intraoperative thermal imaging based on artificial tactile sensing. Najafi and Woodbury (2015) used the ANN as a digital filter approach to estimate the heat flux. Chanda et al (2017) estimated the principal thermal conductivities of layered honeycomb composites using the ANN and genetic algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%