Online Health Behavior and Disease Management Programs: Are We Ready for Them? Are They Ready for Us?

Abstract

Advancing the science and practice of health promotion and disease management on the Internet requires a systematic program of research examining the population impact of such programs. With impact described as the combination of effectiveness and participation, such research needs to include the examination of the quality and effectiveness of programs that are available to the general public, as well as descriptive and predictive knowledge about population readiness to participate in such programs.There have been few studies examining the quality of interactive health behavior change (HBC) programs on the Internet, and even fewer investigations of the effectiveness of such programs. Based on the review of over 300 HBC programs on the Internet using the “5 A's” of Health Behavior Change on the Internet (HBC-I Screener), which represent standard minimum guidelines for evaluation, it appears HBC on the Internet is in the early stages of development. As health behavior change on the Internet matures from the provision of health information to meeting the requirements necessary to produce health behavior change, and as program developers take advantage of the interactive nature of the Internet, the basic screening and expanded evaluation criteria developed in this project will provide templates for both consumers and developers of programs. The second component necessary for evaluating the impact of HBC on the Internet is the extent to which the population is ready to participate in such programs. We need to move beyond a narrow focus on early adopters and produce a population perspective that includes those not ready, those getting ready, and those ready to use such programs, as well as those already participating. By understanding participation levels of such programs, and what drives this participation, the development and dissemination of practical tailored and targeted interventions can help maximize population participation in Internet programs for health behavior change.

Using Online Computer Tailoring to Promote Physical Activity: A Randomized Trial of Text, Video, and Combined Intervention Delivery Modes

“…This is in line with other studies, where features aimed to increase websites' interactivity (personally tailored feedback) and attractiveness (such as videos) increased the time participants spent on the website (Brouwer et al, 2011;Brouwer et al, 2008;Ferney, Marshall, Eakin, & Owen, 2009). The fact that using video-tailored feedback resulted in participants spending more time on the website is an important finding of this study, as it has been demonstrated that the more time participants spent on the website, which equals more exposure to intervention content, the more likely the intervention might induce changes in health behaviors (Lewis et al, 2008;McKay et al, 2001;Schubart, Stuckey, Ganeshamoorthy, & Sciamanna, 2011;Steele et al, 2007).…”

“…However, engagement and retention problems have been reported for this type of intervention (van den Berg, Schoones, & Vliet Vlieland, 2007). Health interventions provided via the Internet are struggling with dropout rates that reach up to 40-50% (Bennett & Glasgow, 2009;Evers, Cummins, Prochaska, & Prochaska, 2005;Eysenbach, 2005). Thus, although website-delivered interventions have the potential to reach large numbers of people, this is often not achieved.…”

Pilot study of Internet-based early intervention for combat-related mental distress

“…However, the relatively low recruitment rate of 7 percent (vs 28%-40% in face-to-face recruitment models) suggests a selection bias may have played a role, supporting conjecture 2 [43][44]. However, these low recruitment rates may not be unusual for a fully online intervention and may be consistent with the finding that only 10 to 20 percent of adults are interested in an Internet-based lifestyle change at any given time [45][46]. Furthermore, the moderate depression pre/post ESs were less than those seen in treatment interventions involving therapist and discussion group contact (VETS PRE-VAIL ES = 0.45 vs Internet plus therapist contact ES = 0.93) [21,[47][48] but comparable with preventive interventions using an Internet-only approach (male adolescents ES = 0.29) [47,49].…”

Interactive Behavior Change Technology to Support Diabetes Self-Management

“…and more than 75% met no more than two (81). IBCT is no different from any other tool for improving patients ' care, and its value depends on its goals, informational content, and appropriate patient targeting.…”