2022
DOI: 10.1111/bjet.13182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Online exam proctoring technologies: Educational innovation or deterioration?

Abstract: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creat ive Commo ns Attri bution-NonCo mmercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
57
0
4

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(57 reference statements)
3
57
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of initiatives from the universities or the government that encourage the acquisition of necessary resources (computers, webcams, headphones, microphones, and Internet connection), no measures have been taken to encourage said acquisition because their use has not yet been decided, but it is something that should be taken into account if they decide to implement this process one day. This implementation has social implications, and it cannot be allowed to generate inequalities in terms of opportunities depending on whether a student has the necessary resources or not [129,130].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of initiatives from the universities or the government that encourage the acquisition of necessary resources (computers, webcams, headphones, microphones, and Internet connection), no measures have been taken to encourage said acquisition because their use has not yet been decided, but it is something that should be taken into account if they decide to implement this process one day. This implementation has social implications, and it cannot be allowed to generate inequalities in terms of opportunities depending on whether a student has the necessary resources or not [129,130].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Videoconferencing applications such as ZOOM can be used to monitor the student's activities during the examination. The more advanced software applications for proctoring detect movement or prevent the student from opening other applications and doing web search during the examination [16]. These include the Respondus Lockdown Browser which can easily be integrated with Learning Management Systems such as MOODLE.…”
Section: Online Exams and Academic Integritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He argues that even though students were motivated to learn online, and appreciated the collaborative and ‘hands‐on’ opportunities offered by online learning, they prefer blended learning, since face to face teaching enables them to have a proper contact and social interactions with their peers, and also industry professionals in a physical environment. The research carried out by Lee and Fanguy ( 2022 ) focuses on online exam proctoring technologies. The researchers examine the impact and effectiveness of the technology in a South Korean context on three areas, namely student subjectivities, pedagogical relationships, and educational outcomes.…”
Section: Higher Education In the Eastmentioning
confidence: 99%