2017
DOI: 10.1186/s40345-017-0095-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Online ethics: where will the interface of mental health and the internet lead us?

Abstract: While e-health initiatives are poised to revolutionize delivery and access to mental health care, conducting clinical research online involves specific contextual and ethical considerations. Face-to-face psychosocial interventions can at times entail risk and have adverse psychoactive effects, something true for online mental health programs too. Risks associated with and specific to internet psychosocial interventions include potential breaches of confidentiality related to online communications (such as unen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Electronic health (E-health) allows health resources and health care status to be communicated and transferred by electronic medium 19 . Smartphone applications allow global access, enabling assessment or intervention for adults with depression and other psychiatric disorders 20 , 21 . Patients report high levels of satisfaction with the E-mental health programme as a self-help tool because it overcomes multiple barriers, including cost, timeliness and concerns regarding confidentiality 22 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electronic health (E-health) allows health resources and health care status to be communicated and transferred by electronic medium 19 . Smartphone applications allow global access, enabling assessment or intervention for adults with depression and other psychiatric disorders 20 , 21 . Patients report high levels of satisfaction with the E-mental health programme as a self-help tool because it overcomes multiple barriers, including cost, timeliness and concerns regarding confidentiality 22 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Legalities surrounding Web-based delivery of mental health interventions across different jurisdictions require urgent attention. Currently, university ethical review boards are either unaware of, or not resourced to address, legal issues arising from geographic jurisdictions other than their own [ 37 ]. For review boards to undertake appropriate vetting of clinical trials of Web-based interventions, clear identification of protective factors (eg, participants’ privacy and safety, ethical considerations, and risk issues) across jurisdictions is necessary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transparent models for multinational internet intervention research initiatives are now needed to navigate these legalities. One component of such a model may include clearly informing participants in consenting documents that while their participation has been ethically vetted by only one institution in a given geographic and legal jurisdiction, they remain bound by legal and ethical precedents in their own geographical jurisdiction [ 37 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The lack of regulation and validation of many commercially available remote monitoring methods is especially relevant in this regard [38]. Participants might be provided with poor information, or encouraged towards selfdiagnosis and self-treatment rather seeking appropriate support [39]. Equally concerning are suggestions that when used inappropriately, remote interventions may even increase symptoms of anxiety/mental distress [40].…”
Section: Ethicsmentioning
confidence: 99%