2007
DOI: 10.1080/01421590601045916
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Online collaborative learning for healthcare continuing professional development: a cross-case analysis of three case studies

Abstract: There has been increasing interest in the use of computers to facilitate collaborative learning between healthcare professionals for continuing professional development but many schemes appear to be unsuccessful. The aim of the study was to identify, from a cross-case analysis of three case studies, the main factors that facilitate and inhibit online collaborative learning for healthcare continuing professional development. The intervention was an asynchronous, structured and moderated discussion board. Data w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though there have been many attempts to make use of collaborative online tools to facili tate health professional education, these have often been unsuccessful. This has been largely because the contextual working and learning needs of students were not taken into consideration dur ing implementation, and support was not provided (Sandars et al, 2007). Finally, South African students from lower socioeconomic groups have more dif ficulty getting online when they are not on campus, placing them at a greater disadvantage than they already expe rience (Czerniewicz, et al, 2009).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though there have been many attempts to make use of collaborative online tools to facili tate health professional education, these have often been unsuccessful. This has been largely because the contextual working and learning needs of students were not taken into consideration dur ing implementation, and support was not provided (Sandars et al, 2007). Finally, South African students from lower socioeconomic groups have more dif ficulty getting online when they are not on campus, placing them at a greater disadvantage than they already expe rience (Czerniewicz, et al, 2009).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beside this fact, changes originating from inside and outside the system have challenged the conventional approaches to management (Sandars et al, 2007;Kazu, 2009). Therefore, an evaluation program involves systematic and complex operations of data gathering, observation, analysis and at the end considering all aspects to be able to judge the quality and to present a solution Duangsin et al, 2011) The evaluation framework which has been recommended to make decisions in high education system includes evaluation of the content, evaluation of the data, evaluation of the processes and evaluation of the results (Farzianpour et al, 2004;Nasiri and Deng, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, whilst six research studies [1,8,[28][29][30][31] evaluated this from the users' perspectives, only two of the six [28,30] had done so with a focus on the online communication patterns. The remaining paper by Zhu [32] had a focus on the interactional patterns of discussions, but it was aimed at establishing the levels of student cognitive engagement through the analysis.…”
Section: Number and Characteristics Of Research Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Six of the seven research studies [8,[28][29][30] were clearly about nurses in mix-disciplinary online learning. The paper in this literature review by Zhu [32] did not specify if the undergraduate and postgraduate healthcare student populations in the online discussions comprised registered nurses.…”
Section: Number and Characteristics Of Research Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation