Online Chats to Assess Stakeholder Perceptions of Meat Chicken Intensification and Welfare

Abstract

Simple SummaryMost people care about animal welfare. Nevertheless, divergent views remain on what constitutes animal welfare, despite a growing body of scientific evidence. We used online chats to trigger discussion among participants from various stakeholder groups: general public, animal advocacy group, meat chicken industry-affiliated, and researchers or veterinarians who were not industry-affiliated but had experience with chickens. The aim of this pilot study was to assess reasons for divergence in opinions or conversely agreement between participants, using the topic of the welfare implications of meat chicken farming intensification. Participants also completed a pre- and post-chat survey to evaluate their perceptions and knowledge of chicken farming. Reasons for supporting intensification included perceptions of better health for the chickens and the sustainability of the system. Reasons for opposition included perceptions of the large number of animals kept together, and limited ability to perform natural behaviours. Misunderstandings about current practices were clarified in chats which contained industry-affiliated participants. Participants agreed on the need for enforceable standards and industry transparency. On average, objective knowledge of intensification increased after participating in the chat, but support for intensification did not change over the course of the study, counter to assertions that lack of knowledge results in lack of support for some practices. Engaging stakeholders can provide valuable information to anyone interested in the relationship between perception and knowledge of specific farming practices.AbstractEvidence suggests that there is variation in support for specific chicken farming practices amongst stakeholder groups, and this should be explored in more detail to understand the nature of these differences and work towards convergence. Online focus groups were used to assess attitudes to animal welfare in meat chicken farming in this pilot study. Across six online chats, 25 participants (general public, n = 8; animal advocacy group, n = 11, meat chicken industry, n = 3; research or veterinary practice who had experience with poultry but no declared industry affiliation, n = 3) discussed meat chicken intensification and welfare. Of those, 21 participants completed pre- and post-chat surveys gauging perceptions and objective knowledge about meat chicken management. Main reasons for intensification support were perceptions of improved bird health, and perceptions that it is a cost-effective, sustainable farming system. Reasons for opposition included perceptions that a large number of birds kept are in close proximity and have limited ability to perform natural behaviours. Misunderstandings about current practices were clarified in chats which contained industry representation. Participants agreed on the need for enforceable standards and industry transparency. Industry-affiliated members rated welfare of meat chickens higher, and gave lower ratings for the importance of n...

Brazilian Citizens’ Opinions and Attitudes about Farm Animal Production Systems

“…However, it has also been discussed [ 42 , 61 ] that non-experts assess technologies based on risk and moral values. Indeed, numerous reports show that increasing information tends to result in increase opposition to contentious livestock production practices [ 8 , 29 , 40 , 62 , 63 , 64 ].…”

Natural Behaviour Is Not Enough: Farm Animal Welfare Needs Modern Answers to Tinbergen’s Four Questions

“…Being able to perform natural behaviour has also become, for some, what good welfare means, an expression of animal’s essence or telos and the way it was evolved to be in its natural environment [ 15 , 22 , 23 ]. This view is also reflected in surveys of public opinion, which consistently sees natural behaviour as an essential part of animal welfare [ 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 ].…”

Consumers' perceptions and willingness to purchase pork labelled ‘raised without antibiotics’

“…Consumers lack awareness towards the negative repercussions that banning or restricting antibiotics may have on animal welfare (Goddard et al, 2017); as 70% of US consumers purchase 'raised without antibiotics' labelled meat and poultry with the belief that it is healthier for the animal (Singer et al, 2019); and that it promotes good animal husbandry, while only 12% of consumers believe that it harms, or has no impact (9%) on animal welfare (Karavolias et al, 2018). As knowledge is an antecedent of beliefs (Howell et al, 2016) these results are indicative of an information gap in consumer understanding of animal welfare issues and knowledge surrounding agricultural antimicrobial use.…”