The Handbook of the Psychology of Communication Technology 2015
DOI: 10.1002/9781118426456.ch17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Online Addictions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 113 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When compared with primarily offline gamblers, online gamblers appear to have distinct characteristics and gambling preferences and may have higher rates of problem gambling (Wood & Williams, 2011). A large majority of individuals who gamble online also gamble offline, suggesting that gamblers take advantage of the increased access to various gambling forms (Griffiths & Kuss, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When compared with primarily offline gamblers, online gamblers appear to have distinct characteristics and gambling preferences and may have higher rates of problem gambling (Wood & Williams, 2011). A large majority of individuals who gamble online also gamble offline, suggesting that gamblers take advantage of the increased access to various gambling forms (Griffiths & Kuss, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, does highly repetitive technology use represent a pathology that originates with chronic dysphoria, personality traits, or neurological disorders, as "disease" models imply? Empirical research suggests that only a small population of clinically addicted Internet users exists (Alter, 2017;Griffiths & Kuss, 2015;Tokunaga, 2017). Mental illness is generally marked by severe life consequences (e.g.…”
Section: Causal Mechanisms Of Overusementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although we have focused on habits in this chapter, the addiction perspective continues to collide with tech habit research. In response to early disease model investigations of "excessive" usage (now considered average levels of use), there have been growing calls to reassess the assignment of the "addiction" label across disciplines (Billieux et al, 2014;Griffiths & Kuss, 2015;Tokunaga, 2015). Most recently, criticisms about technological and other controversial addictions were funneled into exclusion criterion to limit false positives (Kardefelt-Winther et al, 2017).…”
Section: From Problems To Prospectsmentioning
confidence: 99%