2018
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1625771
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Onkologische Rehabilitation und Wiedereingliederung

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1). 12–42 The selection process generated a kappa score of 0.907 between both reviewers, indicating high agreement.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…1). 12–42 The selection process generated a kappa score of 0.907 between both reviewers, indicating high agreement.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the 31 included studies, 14 had a quantitative design, 12–25 nine had a qualitative design, 26–33,41 two reported on a two-part study incorporating both quantitative and qualitative approaches, 34,42 and six employed a mixed methods design 35–40 (Supplemental Table 1, http://links.lww.com/PHM/C344). Studies originated from European ( n = 13), 15,16,18,20,21,23,27,32,33,36,37,39,41 Oceanian ( n = 11), 12,14,19,22,25,26,29–31,38,40 and North American ( n = 7) 13,17,24,28,34,35,42 countries.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations