2012
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.2523-11.2012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ongoing Cortical Activity at Rest: Criticality, Multistability, and Ghost Attractors

Abstract: The ongoing activity of the brain at rest, i.e., under no stimulation and in absence of any task, is astonishingly highly structured into spatiotemporal patterns. These spatiotemporal patterns, called resting state networks, display low-frequency characteristics (Ͻ0.1 Hz) observed typically in the BOLD-fMRI signal of human subjects. We aim here to understand the origins of resting state activity through modeling via a global spiking attractor network of the brain. This approach offers a realistic mechanistic m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

40
662
1
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 648 publications
(706 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(60 reference statements)
40
662
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, the low level of spontaneous correlations (∼0.1) reported here may be an indication that the network operates in a single state, but near the multistability. This view is supported by recent studies showing that spiking networks represent better both the FF reduction and the resting-state correlations of fMRI signals near criticality (51,52). This scenario is functionally meaningful as, at this working point, the network can rapidly react to an external stimulus and represent it in one attractor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Nevertheless, the low level of spontaneous correlations (∼0.1) reported here may be an indication that the network operates in a single state, but near the multistability. This view is supported by recent studies showing that spiking networks represent better both the FF reduction and the resting-state correlations of fMRI signals near criticality (51,52). This scenario is functionally meaningful as, at this working point, the network can rapidly react to an external stimulus and represent it in one attractor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…These models yield synthetic low-frequency BOLD time-series which, to varying accuracy levels, predict functional connectivity from structural connectivity through diverse dynamical phenomena including synchronization of chaotic activity, reverberation, metastability, and noise-induced exploration of "ghost" attractors. 7,8,30,66 Our experimental observations of stronger lowfrequency activity and non-linear structure in highly synchronized (high node degree) cortical areas, if confirmed with higher-temporal resolution techniques such as magnetoencephalography, may help set further constraints to the validity of these models beyond the prevalent Pearson coefficient-based comparison of functional connectivity matrices. [6][7][8][9][10]58 To our knowledge, across existing simulation studies elements of this correspondence have been reported heterogeneously.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…19,28,29 At the same time, the fact that realistic RSNs emerge even in highly simplified simulation scenarios, for example, from networked phase (Kuramoto) oscillators or discrete excitable units, raises the intriguing possibility of recapitulating some dynamical phenomena underlying brain function in other physical systems, where direct manipulation of connectivity is possible and causal relationships between connectivity and non-linear dynamics can be explored experimentally. [8][9][10]30 In particular, it has recently been shown that singletransistor oscillators can exhibit strikingly complex activity depending on an easily tunable control parameter (DC voltage source series resistance), oscillating periodically, chaotically, or close to criticality. 31 An experimental investigation of a ring of 30 diffusively coupled such oscillators, each consisting of a bipolar junction transistor, three reactive components and a resistor, has furthermore demonstrated the spontaneous formation of multi-scale community structure as a function of coupling strength, with elements of similarity to the modular organization observed in brain networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approaches that are based on spiking neuron models use firing rates as input for BOLD signal estimation. Authors motivated that by the fact that in most cases, the firing rate is well correlated with excitatory synaptic activity (Deco and Jirsa, 2012). In the present study, however, the Stefanescu-Jirsa model provides six state variables with different biophysical counterparts; futhermore, each of them is described by the sum of the activity of three modes which model the activity of different neuronal subclusters of the inhibitory and the excitatory populations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%