2018
DOI: 10.3390/jcm7120554
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

One-Year Progression and Risk Factors for the Development of Chronic Kidney Disease in Septic Shock Patients with Acute Kidney Injury: A Single-Centre Retrospective Cohort Study

Abstract: (1) Background: Sepsis-associated acute kidney injury (AKI) can lead to permanent kidney damage, although the long-term prognosis in patients with septic shock remains unclear. This study aimed to identify risk factors for the development of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in septic shock patients with AKI. (2) Methods: A single-site, retrospective cohort study was conducted using a registry of adult septic shock patients. Data from patients who had developed AKI between January 2011 and April 2017 were extracted… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are many factors affecting mortality in patients with septic shock, but this study focused on patient's factors. Demographic and clinical data including age, sex, previous medical history, symptoms, initial vital signs, site of infection, and the first laboratory values at the time of admission were retrieved from the septic shock registry [11][12][13][14][15]. Data on initial hemoglobin levels at the time of admission to ED and on whether blood transfusions were performed were also examined to determine the relationship between hemoglobin and mortality.…”
Section: Data Collection and Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many factors affecting mortality in patients with septic shock, but this study focused on patient's factors. Demographic and clinical data including age, sex, previous medical history, symptoms, initial vital signs, site of infection, and the first laboratory values at the time of admission were retrieved from the septic shock registry [11][12][13][14][15]. Data on initial hemoglobin levels at the time of admission to ED and on whether blood transfusions were performed were also examined to determine the relationship between hemoglobin and mortality.…”
Section: Data Collection and Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MAP of the septic shock group and the vasoplegic shock group were significantly lower than that of the cryptic shock group (71 [59-90], 71 [61-81] and 88 [75-100] mm Hg, respectively; P < .001). The mean SOFA score of the cryptic shock group was lower than that of the septic shock group and that of the vasoplegic shock group score (8 [6][7][8][9][10], 7 [5][6][7][8][9], 3 [2][3][4]; P < .001) ( Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Patient data were prospectively collected in our Septic Shock Registry. 8,10,11 Septic shock was defined as per the previous septic shock definition, which included suspected or confirmed infection and evidence of refractory hypotension or hypoperfusion. 8,12 Refractory hypotension was defined as persistent hypotension: systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg, MAP < 65 mm Hg or systolic blood pressure decrease >40 mm Hg after adequate intravenous fluid challenge (20-30 mL/kg or at least 1 L of crystalloid solution administered over 30 minutes), or as the need for vasopressors after fluid resuscitation.…”
Section: Study Design and Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The association between AKI and CKD was also reported in non-surgical patients [32,33]. However, this association was not found in patients with a history of septic shock during one-year follow-up [34]. Furthermore, there have been only a few studies investigating the association between AKI and long-term renal functional decline for radical nephrectomy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Our primary outcome developed in 40.5% (n = 226/558) of patients. The median follow-up of renal function was 35 (25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37) months. The numbers of patients lost to follow-up at 2 and 3 years after surgery were 143 (24.7%) and 305 (52.8%) (Table S1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%