1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00117-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

One-Year Outcomes of Diabetic Versus Nondiabetic Patients With Non–Q-Wave Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated With Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is consistent with previous studies that primarily used a conservative management strategy for UA/NSTEMI [7,8,9,10,11]. Nevertheless, as our major novel finding we were able to attribute most of this excess risk to two factors: more advanced coronary artery disease and more severe UA/NSTEMI at presentation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This finding is consistent with previous studies that primarily used a conservative management strategy for UA/NSTEMI [7,8,9,10,11]. Nevertheless, as our major novel finding we were able to attribute most of this excess risk to two factors: more advanced coronary artery disease and more severe UA/NSTEMI at presentation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The number of adults with diabetes mellitus worldwide is likely to grow from 135 million in 1995 to approximately 300 million in 2025 [6]. However, only limited information is available regarding the outcome of diabetic patients after hospital admission with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (UA/NSTEMI), the most common reason for admission to a coronary care unit [7,8,9,10,11]. The OASIS registry prospectively collected data from UA/NSTEMI patients treated with predominately medical therapy in six different countries including the United States, and reported that diabetes mellitus independently predicted mortality [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,6) However, AMI patients with DM still have a poor prognosis. [1][2][3] They are frequently susceptible to poor prognostic conditions such as reinfarction, 10) the need for target vessel revascularization (TVR), 11) and heart failure. 12,13) Furthermore, there have been several reports on the relationship between DM and cardiac death in AMI patients, [1][2][3]14) while on the other hand, some researchers have reported conflicting results with respect to whether the presence of DM becomes a predictor of mortality in AMI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12,13) Furthermore, there have been several reports on the relationship between DM and cardiac death in AMI patients, [1][2][3]14) while on the other hand, some researchers have reported conflicting results with respect to whether the presence of DM becomes a predictor of mortality in AMI. 11,15) Yet, it is still unclear whether there is a clear relationship between DM and cardiac mortality in AMI patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neben akuten ischämischen Komplikationen weisen Patienten mit höhergradigen Koronarstenosen (> 70%) häufig limitierende Angina pectoris auf. Die perkutane transluminale Koronarangioplastie (PTCA) hat sich als ein Standardverfahren in der Behandlung von Patienten mit koronarer Ein-und Mehrgefäßerkrankung etabliert [4,5,11]. Die primäre Erfolgsrate dieses Verfahrens beträgt 90 bis 95% [12,19], wobei mit schweren Komplikationen bei elektiven Interventionen in unter 3% der Fälle [6] und bei Risikopatienten in 5 bis 10% der Fälle zu rechnen ist [7].…”
unclassified