2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

One-Year Outcome of Critically Ill Patients With Systemic Rheumatic Disease

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Critically ill patients with systemic rheumatic disease (SRD) have benefited from better provision of rheumatic and critical care in recent years. Recent comprehensive data regarding in-hospital mortality rates and, most importantly, long-term outcomes are scarce.RESEARCH QUESTION: The aim of this study was to assess short and long-term outcome of patients with SRD who were admitted to the ICU.STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: All records of patients with SRD who were admitted to ICU between 2006 and 2016 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
0
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
21
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This inverse proportion reflects bias related to the population for which ECMO is indicated: a small percentage of bacterial/viral pneumonias require VV-ECMO implantation and few infections (mainly severe septic shock) will need VA-ECMO cannulation. At the same time, the number of patients admitted for their first SRD manifestation was particularly high: one-third of our patients vs. onetenth in previous reports [2,3]. While those admissions for infection had usually been associated with worse outcomes, the in-hospital survival rates of our flare and infection patients were similar.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This inverse proportion reflects bias related to the population for which ECMO is indicated: a small percentage of bacterial/viral pneumonias require VV-ECMO implantation and few infections (mainly severe septic shock) will need VA-ECMO cannulation. At the same time, the number of patients admitted for their first SRD manifestation was particularly high: one-third of our patients vs. onetenth in previous reports [2,3]. While those admissions for infection had usually been associated with worse outcomes, the in-hospital survival rates of our flare and infection patients were similar.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Available literature is scarce, other than multiple case reports, and ECMO use was anecdotical in previous populations: 6 (1.6%) patients in the study by Dumas and colleagues [2], 6 (7.3%) and 3 (3.1%) in the largest ICU studies on antineutrophil cytoplasm antibody-associated vasculitides [15,16]. A significant number of the 62 (11.8%) ECMO-treated patients in Larcher and colleagues' recent paper [3] were managed in our center and are also included herein, however this study did not specifically addressed the characteristics, management and outcomes of ECMO-treated patients and, therefore, does not duplicate the results of the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations