2021
DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2021.1896793
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

One year on: an updated systematic review of SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 and audio-vestibular symptoms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
133
1
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(155 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
13
133
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…From 17 included studies, the estimated prevalence was 8% (CI: 5 to 13%). This is between the prevalence rates reported by Almufarrij and Munro [10] of 14.8% (CI: 6.3 to 26.1) and Jafari et al [11] of 4.5% (CI: 1.2 to 15.3). All three reviews included different studies due to different protocols followed but provide some insights into the possible expected prevalence from the published literature.…”
Section: The Effect Of Contracting Covid-19 On Tinnitussupporting
confidence: 45%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…From 17 included studies, the estimated prevalence was 8% (CI: 5 to 13%). This is between the prevalence rates reported by Almufarrij and Munro [10] of 14.8% (CI: 6.3 to 26.1) and Jafari et al [11] of 4.5% (CI: 1.2 to 15.3). All three reviews included different studies due to different protocols followed but provide some insights into the possible expected prevalence from the published literature.…”
Section: The Effect Of Contracting Covid-19 On Tinnitussupporting
confidence: 45%
“…Due to the different types of study designs included in this review, quality assessment for the included studies was assessed using the National Institute of Health Quality Assessment Tools [53]. Although other tools are available, using the same tool as used in similar systematic reviews (e.g., Almufarrij and Munro [10]) allowed for consistency. Specifically, the Quality Assessment Tool for Case-Control Studies, for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies, and for Before-After (Pre-Post) Studies with No Control Group were used depending on the study design.…”
Section: Risk Of Bias Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, in some of the reported cases the absence of audiological examination prior to the onset of the acute hearing loss, is another possible drawback since it is not possible to compare pre and post hearing threshold levels. This aspect has been discussed by other Authors 41,42,43,44 ; in some of the reported cases, it is not clear if the symptoms represent the worsening of a pre-existing disease triggered by SARS-CoV-2, or a clinical manifestation entirely related to the virus, or a coincidental event.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In conclusion, given our reported experience, the recent report by MHRA and the preliminary data on tinnitus and SNHL caused by Sars-CoV-2 infection (Almufarrij and Munro 2021), large-scale well-designed studies are needed to improve surveillance of the COVID-19 vaccine, to clearly establish if tinnitus is an adverse effect and better define possible adverse reactions involving the cochleo-vestibular system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%