2015
DOI: 10.5194/acpd-15-1343-2015
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

One year of Raman lidar observations of free tropospheric aerosol layers over South Africa

Abstract: Abstract. Raman lidar data obtained over a one year period has been analyzed in relation to aerosol layers in the free troposphere over the Highveld in South Africa. In total, 375 layers were observed above the boundary layer during the period 30 January 2010–31 January 2011. The seasonal behavior of aerosol layer geometrical characteristics, as well as intensive and extensive optical properties were studied. The highest center heights of free tropospheric layers were observed during the South African spring (… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
(81 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean values of the LPDR and AE ( Figure 6 c,d) indicate changes in the shape and size of the aerosols due to the transforming processes that smoke aerosols went through, during their long-range transport, as mentioned before. The LPDR values, that ranged between 0.04 to 0.15 and those of AE greater than 1 (not exceeding 1.9), are representative for smoke aerosols [ 33 , 34 ]. On the other hand, LPDR values, greater than 0.20 and AE values close to zero, indicate the presence of dust aerosols [ 1 , 19 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean values of the LPDR and AE ( Figure 6 c,d) indicate changes in the shape and size of the aerosols due to the transforming processes that smoke aerosols went through, during their long-range transport, as mentioned before. The LPDR values, that ranged between 0.04 to 0.15 and those of AE greater than 1 (not exceeding 1.9), are representative for smoke aerosols [ 33 , 34 ]. On the other hand, LPDR values, greater than 0.20 and AE values close to zero, indicate the presence of dust aerosols [ 1 , 19 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At Marikana and Elandsfontein the largest observed AODs are not related to largest CS, which could be due to the presence of elevated aerosol layers. In a recent study by Giannakaki et al (2015) data from a ground-based lidar at Elandsfontein are analyzed and the results show that the mean contribution of elevated aerosol layers to the AOD is 46 %. To estimate the effect of elevated aerosol layers on the CS-AOD comparison at Marikana, CALIPSO observations of aerosol vertical extinction profiles are used.…”
Section: Comparison Of Condensation Sink and Aerosol Optical Depthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laakso et al (2008) and Vakkari et al (2011) have studied new particle formation over moderately polluted savannah ecosystems in South Africa and found that nucleation takes place in the boundary layer almost every sunny day throughout the year with a frequency of as high as 69 % of all analyzed days (Vakkari et al, 2011). Hirsikko et al (2012) extended the studies in South Africa to a polluted measurement site and found an even higher frequency for the nucleation event days (86 %), which is among the highest event frequencies reported in the literature so far. Hirsikko et al (2013) also studied the causes for two or three consecutive daytime nucleation events, followed by subsequent particle growth during the same day.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In principle, the emitted linearly polarised light is backscattered, mainly with the same linear polarisation and partly depolarised, upon interaction with atmospheric targets which are non-spherical and randomly oriented (Mishchenko and Hovenier, 1995). The polarisation-sensitive detection of the collected backscattered signal is usually performed by separating the signal into two optical paths; the first (parallel or co-polar) contains the backscattered light with the original polarisation and half of the depolarised light, and the second (cross or cross-polar) contains the other half of the depolarised light (Gimmestad, 2008). There are also systems that rely on the detection of the total and cross-backscattered signals instead (Engelmann et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%