2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ihj.2013.08.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

One-year clinical outcomes of BioMatrix™-Biolimus A9™ eluting stent: The e-BioMatrix multicenter post marketing surveillance registry in India

Abstract: This registry demonstrates excellent one-year clinical safety and efficacy of BioMatrix stents. The 1-year result shows that BioMatrix stent may be a suitable alternative as compared to contemporary DESs which are currently available in the market for simple as well complex disease.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the importance of ST in evaluating the overall performance of DES, we estimated the ST rate in our study. The rates of both possible and probable late ST was 0.78% in the present study, which are comparable to those of other standard BP-DES such as sirolimus-eluting Orsiro stents (0.4%), biolimus-eluting Nobori stents (1.2%), and Biolimus A9 stents (0.2%) at 1-year follow-up[14,20]. The low rate of ST observed in our study could be attributed to complete wall apposition of the NeoHexa stent and appropriate endothelial healing over the 1-year period.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given the importance of ST in evaluating the overall performance of DES, we estimated the ST rate in our study. The rates of both possible and probable late ST was 0.78% in the present study, which are comparable to those of other standard BP-DES such as sirolimus-eluting Orsiro stents (0.4%), biolimus-eluting Nobori stents (1.2%), and Biolimus A9 stents (0.2%) at 1-year follow-up[14,20]. The low rate of ST observed in our study could be attributed to complete wall apposition of the NeoHexa stent and appropriate endothelial healing over the 1-year period.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…We evaluated real-world data of NeoHexa in an unselected clinical practice population with diverse clinical profiles, which included diabetes (39.53%), hypertension (49.61%), bifurcation and thrombotic lesions (11.04%), and ACC/AHA type B and C lesions (94.77%). The presentation of patients was similar to that reported in studies of other similar stents[13,14]. The NeoHexa stent is designed to have thin struts (60 μm) on a cobalt-chromium platform with a unique and innovative “s” link and an alternate “C” link, which provides high radial strength and no foreshortening, making it ideal for all lesion locations including ostial lesions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Along with NEXT trial, the NOBORI 2 study also concluded good and sustained performance of biodegradable polymers in high-risk patients with indicative comorbidities and/or complex lesions [21]. Moreover, the safety and performance of biodegradable polymers with limus family of DES were firmly accepted in a real-world patient population [17] [20]. In this study, we collected and analyzed the data of Metafor SES with the perspective to evaluate the safety and performance of Metafor SES.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ltd., Vapi, India) has been developed with an objective to reduce the adverse effects of existing DES. In a real-world patient population biodegradable polymer have demonstrated excellent safety and performance in CAD patients as quoted in several studies of DES [16] [17]. The Metafor SES (Meril Life Sciences Pvt.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of note, transradial PCI procedures were almost 90% and switching from radial to femoral access to complete the stent deployment was never needed. The BM shares with the well-studied BioMime™ DES technological characteristic (sirolimus elution, biodegradable polymeric carrier and ultrathin stent struts) associated with low late lumen loss and reduced hazard of thrombus formation in both studies [11][12][13][14][15] and meta-analyses [16,17]. The primary safety and efficacy trials meriT-1 [18] and meriT-2 [19] and, more recently, the observational post-marketing multisite registry meriT-3 [14] reported low rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and late stent thrombosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%