2019
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab2b9d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

One-, Two-, and Three-dimensional Simulations of Oxygen-shell Burning Just before the Core Collapse of Massive Stars

Abstract: We perform two-(2D) and three-dimensional (3D) hydrodynamics simulations of convective oxygen shell-burning that takes place deep inside a massive progenitor star of a core-collapse supernova. Using one dimensional (1D) stellar evolution code, we first calculate the evolution of massive stars with an initial mass of 9-40 M . Four different overshoot parameters are applied, and CO core mass trend similar to previous works is obtained in the 1D models. Selecting eleven 1D models that have a silicon and oxygen co… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
72
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
(166 reference statements)
5
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We calculate the evolution of 15 M stars with metallicities of Z = 0.014(Z ), 0.5Z , 0.2Z , and 0 from hydrogen burning until the central temperature reaches 10 9.9 K. For metallicities of 0.5Z , we also calculate the evolution for 13, 17, and 20 M stars. These calculations are performed using a 1D stellar evolution code, HOngo Stellar Hydrodynamics Investigatar (HOSHI) code (Takahashi et al 2016(Takahashi et al , 2018(Takahashi et al , 2019Yoshida et al 2019). Detailed parameter sets of the stellar models are the same as Set L in Yoshida et al (2019).…”
Section: Discussion On the Progenitor Metallicity And Explosion Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We calculate the evolution of 15 M stars with metallicities of Z = 0.014(Z ), 0.5Z , 0.2Z , and 0 from hydrogen burning until the central temperature reaches 10 9.9 K. For metallicities of 0.5Z , we also calculate the evolution for 13, 17, and 20 M stars. These calculations are performed using a 1D stellar evolution code, HOngo Stellar Hydrodynamics Investigatar (HOSHI) code (Takahashi et al 2016(Takahashi et al , 2018(Takahashi et al , 2019Yoshida et al 2019). Detailed parameter sets of the stellar models are the same as Set L in Yoshida et al (2019).…”
Section: Discussion On the Progenitor Metallicity And Explosion Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Collins et al (2018) report a higher occurrence of merging for the O, Ne, and C burning shells in higher mass progenitors between 16 and 26 M , yielding a large Si mass fraction in a large part of the O-rich shell -this is the same as what we observe in our MESA simulations. Similarly, Yoshida et al (2019) obtain distinct composition profiles within the Si-and O-rich shells depending on the adopted convective overshoot strength and progenitor mass.…”
Section: Implications and Comparison To Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Our simulation method is similar to 1 dimensional (1D) simulation method in Yoshida et al (2019). We follow the time evolutions of stars with M = 8, 10,13,16,20,25,32,40,50,65,80,100,125, and 160 M for log(Z/Z ) = -2, -4, -5, -6 and −8 from the zero age main-sequence (ZAMS) to the carbon ignitions at the stellar centers.…”
Section: Simulation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%