1996
DOI: 10.1037/0882-7974.11.3.417
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

One-trial associative priming of nonwords in young and older adults.

Abstract: In this article, three experiments in which single-trial associative priming for nonwords was investigated in young and older adults in a pronunciation task are reported. During an encoding task, associative priming was observed for young and older adults, although cued recall was near zero for both groups. Associative priming for young and older adults was found under full attention conditions, but when attention was divided at study, associative priming was observed in Experiment 3, but not in Experiment 2. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As indicated earlier, intact associative priming in memory impaired individuals was initially documented not only with stem-completion, but also in a study that used speeded reading as the dependent measure (Moscovitch et al, 1986). The first attempted replication of this result was unsuccessful (Musen and Squire, 1993), but in this case, associative priming was absent from the performances of patients and controls alike, which raised concerns that there may have been insufficient power to detect a statistically significant difference in reading time across lists of intact and recombined word pairs (Light et al, 1996; Poldrack and Cohen, 1997). In line with this possibility, affirmative evidence for associative priming in speeded reading was reported in a subsequent experiment conducted with college-age participants (Poldrack and Cohen, 1997).…”
Section: Associative Priming: Identifying Investigative Pitfalls In Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As indicated earlier, intact associative priming in memory impaired individuals was initially documented not only with stem-completion, but also in a study that used speeded reading as the dependent measure (Moscovitch et al, 1986). The first attempted replication of this result was unsuccessful (Musen and Squire, 1993), but in this case, associative priming was absent from the performances of patients and controls alike, which raised concerns that there may have been insufficient power to detect a statistically significant difference in reading time across lists of intact and recombined word pairs (Light et al, 1996; Poldrack and Cohen, 1997). In line with this possibility, affirmative evidence for associative priming in speeded reading was reported in a subsequent experiment conducted with college-age participants (Poldrack and Cohen, 1997).…”
Section: Associative Priming: Identifying Investigative Pitfalls In Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies, however, looked at priming of new associations between familiar stimuli, so the contribution of preexisting memory representations was not fully minimized (but see Light, Kennison, Prull, La Voie, & Zuellig, 1996). Schacter, Cooper, and Valdiserri (1992) and Wiggs (1993) did use unfamiliar stimuli and found age equivalence in priming.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When new associative learning occurs via the integration of surface-level features, associative priming has been shown to be insensitive to encoding manipulations that typically affect explicit memory, such as divided attention (Gabrieli et al, 1997; Light et al, 1996; Micco & Masson, 1991; Musen & O’Neill, 1997). Conversely, when the formation of associations occurs via the semantic integration of distinct items, associative priming has not been successfully dissociated from explicit retrieval.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%