2019
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.9b00841
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

One-Step Treatment of Phosphite-Laden Wastewater: A Single Electrochemical Reactor Integrating Superoxide Radical-Induced Oxidation and Electrocoagulation

Abstract: Elimination of phosphite from water is more difficult than elimination of phosphate owing to its higher solubility and resistance to biotransformation. Herein, we report an efficient, facile, electrochemical method integrating electrooxdiation (EO) and electrocoagulation (EC) to treat phosphite-laden wastewater. The mechanistic studies demonstrate that in-situ-generated Fe2+ at an Fe anode can react with in-situ-generated O2 at a mixed metal oxide (MMO) anode, leading to formation of •O2 –, a reactive species … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The detection limit was calculated to be 1.46 μM P­(III) based on 3σ/slope (σ is the standard deviation of the samples without P­(III), see the inset of Figure B). This is comparable with some previous methods for detecting P­(III), such as ion chromatography (0.39 μM), high-performance liquid chromatography (0.04 μM), and spectrophotometry (0.7 and 290.3 μM). The relative standard deviation for the fluorescence intensity of 50 μM phosphite was about 5.8%, suggesting good reproducibility of this sensing strategy.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The detection limit was calculated to be 1.46 μM P­(III) based on 3σ/slope (σ is the standard deviation of the samples without P­(III), see the inset of Figure B). This is comparable with some previous methods for detecting P­(III), such as ion chromatography (0.39 μM), high-performance liquid chromatography (0.04 μM), and spectrophotometry (0.7 and 290.3 μM). The relative standard deviation for the fluorescence intensity of 50 μM phosphite was about 5.8%, suggesting good reproducibility of this sensing strategy.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Phosphite is widely used in commercial products, such as biostimulants, fungicides, , and organophosphorous pesticides. More and more phosphite-rich wastewaters are discharged, and phosphite has been found in natural geothermal pools, drinking water, lakes, and industrial wastewater at concentrations from micro- to millimolar levels.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oxidation induced by Fe­(II)–O 2 interactions in Fe EC has been predominantly attributed to the reactive oxidants of ferryl (i.e., Fe­(IV), eq ) or O 2 •– in previous studies. ,, For example, most researchers agree that Fe­(IV) was the key reactive species for As­(III) oxidation in Fe EC; ,,, van Genuchten et al proposed that O 2 •– and Fe­(IV) were responsible for Mn­(II) oxidation under near neutral conditions, and Liang et al recently ascribed phosphite oxidation to O 2 •– through scavenging experiments . Because of the moderate oxidizing ability of Fe­(IV) (standard reduction potential of Fe­(IV)/Fe­(III): ∼2.0 V/SHE) and O 2 •– (standard reduction potential of O 2 •– /H 2 O 2 : ∼0.9 V/SHE), it is not surprising that the reported oxidizing impact in Fe EC systems was constrained to the inorganic contaminants (i.e., As­(III), Mn­(II), P­(III)) that are liable to oxidize.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though the treatment of non-ortho P generally requires more energy, the electricity demand could be reduced by combining (bio)electrochemical systems with other technologies, such as photocatalysis (Liang et al, 2019;Zhang et al, 2021;Zhang et al, 2019b). Therefore, it is economically possible to include EMP in the current wastewater-treatment system for removing and recovering P. However, the existing studies on the economic evaluation of the EMP of P minerals mainly consider energy (electricity) consumption, while other costs for scale-up systems, such as electrode materials, reactor materials, and maintenance cost, are not taken into consideration.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%