2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.102.115116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

One-step theory of photoelectron escape time: Attosecond spectroscopy of Mg(0001)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The semiclassical model is expected to be an adequate prediction of the photoemission delay time far from band gaps in the final state spectrum and when lattice scattering of the photoelectron wavepacket is weak [33]. Here we probe a region where this semiclassical approach is not applicable and contrast this model with a full one-step treatment in three dimensions [18]. Inspecting the final state band structure of W(110) for normal emission reveals that the dominating conducting branch splits into an "upper branch" and a "lower branch" around a final state energy of 100 eV (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The semiclassical model is expected to be an adequate prediction of the photoemission delay time far from band gaps in the final state spectrum and when lattice scattering of the photoelectron wavepacket is weak [33]. Here we probe a region where this semiclassical approach is not applicable and contrast this model with a full one-step treatment in three dimensions [18]. Inspecting the final state band structure of W(110) for normal emission reveals that the dominating conducting branch splits into an "upper branch" and a "lower branch" around a final state energy of 100 eV (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Modelling the XUV ionization in a solid is also not straightforward. While a more rigorous approach would require to describe the photoionization process in one step [214,215], a phenomenological approach which has been proven to be useful is based on a three step model [181], where the photoionization can be interpreted as composed by (figure 18) a first excitation of the photoelectron (step 1), which then moves from the solid to the surface (step 2) and finally is transmitted through the surface into the vacuum (step 3). Whether or not one model is sufficient to explain the experimental results depends on the target and the level of accuracy required.…”
Section: Tr-photoelectron Spectroscopy In Solidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No experiment can distinguish between photoelectrons excited into different Bloch waves at the same energy and same k . This is especially obvious in the one-step theory of photoemission, in which the final state is represented by the time-reversed LEED state [3,17,21,22], so the photoemission matrix element is a coherent sum of the contributions from different Bloch waves, see a typical example in Fig. 2 below.…”
Section: Addendum: Critique Of the Authors' Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(iii) When the PE mean free path (MFP) is small enough so the weight of the evanescent waves (complex Bloch vector k ⊥ ) in the surface region relevant for photoemision is comparable to that of the propagating wave(s) (real k ⊥ ). The ubiquity of the k -projected gaps and the multi-Bloch-wave character of Ψ pe is well documented for simple [3][4][5][6], noble and d-metals [7,8], layered dichalcogenides [9,10], etc. (see illustration in Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation