2013
DOI: 10.1039/c2ta00315e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

One-step synthesis of magnetic composites of cellulose@iron oxide nanoparticles for arsenic removal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
116
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 298 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(51 reference statements)
8
116
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the decrease of pH from 7 to 2. Similar trends of the effects of pH have commonly been observed with iron oxide-based adsorbents and can be explained by the changes in surface charge of the adsorbents and the arsenic speciation [7][8][9]12,[21][22][23][24]26,32,34,37,38]. Figure 9(b) shows the dependence of surface charge of FeO x -GO-80 on pH.…”
Section: Arsenic Adsorption With Feo X -Go Nanocompositessupporting
confidence: 58%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…the decrease of pH from 7 to 2. Similar trends of the effects of pH have commonly been observed with iron oxide-based adsorbents and can be explained by the changes in surface charge of the adsorbents and the arsenic speciation [7][8][9]12,[21][22][23][24]26,32,34,37,38]. Figure 9(b) shows the dependence of surface charge of FeO x -GO-80 on pH.…”
Section: Arsenic Adsorption With Feo X -Go Nanocompositessupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Though causing only a small reduction in the adsorption of As(III), PO 4 3-shows the expected most intense reduction in the adsorption of As(V). PO 4 3-is a known strong competing anion for arsenic adsorption and can strongly compete with arsenic for adsorption sites [26,32,34] Its effect can be explained by the similar tetrahedral structure formed by As(V), As(III), and phosphate [32]. Despite the excessive presence of the coexisting anions, these results confirm that the concentration of more toxic As(III) can be effectively removed with FeO x -GO-80 to the level (10 µg L -1 ) meeting the WHO guidelines for drinking water.…”
Section: Arsenic Adsorption With Feo X -Go Nanocompositesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Meanwhile, the pore size of the matrices should be signicantly larger than that of the loaded iron oxide nanoparticles, particularly at high iron oxide content, so as to avoid or minimize pore blockages, which would otherwise affect the mass diffusion and consequently the adsorption performance. Typical matrices have included abundant ones, such as naturally occurring minerals, 23 activated carbons, 24 graphene oxide (GO), [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36] and cellulose, 37 as well as some speciallysynthesized ones, such as mesoporous carbons, 38,39 carbon nanotubes, 40 macroporous silica, 41 etc. The majority of composite adsorbents reported to date show limited arsenic adsorption capacities, with signicant room for improvements.…”
Section: -22mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, composite or hybrid structures are promising materials for water treatment. The widely used host materials for nanocomposite include carbonaceous materials like granular activated carbon [25], silica [26][27][28][29], cellulose [30,31], chitosan [32,33], sand [34,35], and polymers [36][37][38]. Some examples include the immobilization of metal oxides on carbon nanotubes for lead, arsenic, and fluoride removal 2 Journal of Nanomaterials [39][40][41], activated carbon immobilized on carbon nanotubes for chromium removal [25], and carbohydrate and iron oxide on multiwalled carbon nanotubes for zinc removal [42].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%