2019
DOI: 10.1007/s42360-019-00147-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

One-step reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification: a simple, sensitive and rapid assay for detection of potato virus X in potato leaves and tubers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results were comparable with those of LAMP testing on other RNA viruses. For examples, LAMP was 100 times more sensitive than rt-PCR on the detection of Citrus leaf blotch virus [21] and Little cherry virus 1 [22]; on Potato virus X [23] and Sugarcane streak mosaic virus [24], LAMP was 10 times more sensitive than rt-PCR. Compared to rt-qPCR, LAMP was similarly sensitive for detection of Onion yellow dwarf virus [25] and Potato leafroll virus [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results were comparable with those of LAMP testing on other RNA viruses. For examples, LAMP was 100 times more sensitive than rt-PCR on the detection of Citrus leaf blotch virus [21] and Little cherry virus 1 [22]; on Potato virus X [23] and Sugarcane streak mosaic virus [24], LAMP was 10 times more sensitive than rt-PCR. Compared to rt-qPCR, LAMP was similarly sensitive for detection of Onion yellow dwarf virus [25] and Potato leafroll virus [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous studies, LAMP was 100 times more sensitive than RT-PCR on the detection of Citrus leaf blotch virus [23] and Little cherry virus 1 [24], while on Potato virus X [25] and Sugarcane streak mosaic virus [26], LAMP was 10 times more sensitive than RT-PCR. Compared to RT-qPCR, LAMP was similarly sensitive for detection of Onion yellow dwarf virus [27] and Potato leafroll virus [28].…”
Section: Sensitivity Of the Lampmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Positive signals were generated from gBlock ToBRFV when its molecule number was more than or equal to 6 per 25-μL reaction (Fig 2A). When gBlock ΔF1c and gBlock ΔB2 were used as the templates, positive signals could be generated when their molecule numbers were more than or equal to 600 per 25-μL reaction; there was no positive signal when the molecule numbers were less than or equal to 60 per 25-μL reaction (Fig 2B). These results confirmed that the LAMP primers were ToBRFV-specific.…”
Section: Lamp On the Gblockmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the short RT incubation, the rest of the primers (F3, FIP, LF and LB) and Bst polymerase are added, and the LAMP reaction is performed at a constant temperature (65 C, 60 min.). It is important to note that our modified protocol involving a separate RT step with only B3 and BIP primers offers superior sensitivity to the conventional 2-step RT-LAMP process where RT incubation is performed with either random hexamers or all of the LAMP primers [22][23][24] .…”
Section: Improved Rt-lamp Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we tested our RT-LAMP reactions detecting SARS-CoV-2 virus in 50 VTM and 34 saliva clinical samples. It is important to note that our protocol gives superior sensitivity to the conventional 2-step RT-LAMP protocol where reverse transcription (RT) is separately performed with all primers followed by an amplification step [22][23][24] . We believe, with our improved LOD and simple RNA extraction-free protocol, our approach will allow rapid scaling of testing and detection of cases which might have been otherwise missed due to low viral loads.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%