2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.eng.2021.02.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

One-Step Reverse Osmosis Based on Riverbank Filtration for Future Drinking Water Purification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, the operational cost for deep defluoridation was estimated as 0.574 RMB per ton of groundwater. As a comparison, the operational cost for the decentralized reverse osmosis system was in the range of 5–10 RMB per ton water. , …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Overall, the operational cost for deep defluoridation was estimated as 0.574 RMB per ton of groundwater. As a comparison, the operational cost for the decentralized reverse osmosis system was in the range of 5–10 RMB per ton water. , …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a comparison, the operational cost for the decentralized reverse osmosis system was in the range of 5−10 RMB per ton water. 52,53 Evolution of the Nanocomposite Structure. After the 150-day field study, the structure evolutions of HZO@D201 are recorded in Figure 7.…”
Section: ■ Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, one can find evidence of the successful application of nutrient recovery and concentration using RO [ 143 ], UF-RO [ 144 ], MF-NF [ 145 ], or NF-RO [ 20 ] processes. For example, Samantha et al [ 145 ] reported that the MF-NF treatment train in a dead-end filtration system produced a particle-free product water from raw pig manure.…”
Section: Modern Trends In Nutrients Recoverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identical analytical measurement was conducted for the RO permeates (ROP) obtained from the AnMBR and AeMBR effluents (Table 2). The average pH of the RO permeate from the AnMBR (6.0) and AeMBR (5.8) effluents were slightly lower than the Singapore's PUB NEWater standard requirement (7.0-8.5) [48], which could be stabilised by adding lime [6] or blending with another source of water [20,32]. Significant removal of TDS, COD, NH 3 -N (AnMBR), NO 3 -N (AeMBR), Or-N, TN, PO 4 -P, and TOC were found for both permeates and a complete non detectable BOD 5 was achieved, while the TDS for AnMBR and AeMBR permeates was respectively lower than the threshold in PUB NEWater standard [48].…”
Section: Ro Performance With Anmbr and Aembr Effluents 321 Indirect P...mentioning
confidence: 99%