2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.rinp.2019.01.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

One-step melt blowing process for PP/PEG micro-nanofiber filters with branch networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, in 2019, Deng et al prepared a multi-scale micro/nano fiber membrane by adding polystyrene (PS) to polypropylene (PP) during the meltblowing process, and the average fiber diameters of the crude and fine fibers were about 8 and 1 μm, respectively [11]. In 2019, Zhang et al fabricated nonwoven micro/nano fibers with a branch structure by adding polyethylene glycol (PEG) to polypropylene (PP) during the meltblowing process, and showed that the microfibers can be as high as 10 μm in diameter and the fine fibers can be as small as 200 nm [12]. In 2018, Soltani et al mixed water-soluble polymer, sulfonated poly(ethylene terephthalate) (SP), hydrophilic polybutylene terephthalate (PBT), and hydrophobic polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) meltblown, and then washed away SP post-treatment to produce a fiber diameter of 200 nm [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in 2019, Deng et al prepared a multi-scale micro/nano fiber membrane by adding polystyrene (PS) to polypropylene (PP) during the meltblowing process, and the average fiber diameters of the crude and fine fibers were about 8 and 1 μm, respectively [11]. In 2019, Zhang et al fabricated nonwoven micro/nano fibers with a branch structure by adding polyethylene glycol (PEG) to polypropylene (PP) during the meltblowing process, and showed that the microfibers can be as high as 10 μm in diameter and the fine fibers can be as small as 200 nm [12]. In 2018, Soltani et al mixed water-soluble polymer, sulfonated poly(ethylene terephthalate) (SP), hydrophilic polybutylene terephthalate (PBT), and hydrophobic polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) meltblown, and then washed away SP post-treatment to produce a fiber diameter of 200 nm [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a) Schematic illustration of the melt‐blown method, b) zoomed image of the drawing draft of melt‐blown setup, c) SEM images of different samples of fibers mats prepared through the melt‐blown method, and d) pictorial presentation of embedded and individual microfiber and nanofiber mats. Reproduced with permission . Copyright 2019, Elsevier B.V.…”
Section: Separator Preparation Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pressure drop pertains to the structure of samples, and the parameters do not alter the structure. Zhang et al found that the quality factor of commercially available melt-blown fabrics was 0.033 Pa −1 [31]. In comparison, the proposed electret melt-blown fabrics outperform the commercially available ones in terms of filtration efficiency.…”
Section: Filtration Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…where Qf is the quality factor, E is the filter efficacy, and ΔP is the reduction voltage [31]. The quality factor is improved with a greater ratio of TiO2 or higher electric field intensity ( Figure 8).…”
Section: Filtration Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%