International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN'06)
DOI: 10.1109/dsn.2006.55
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

One-step Consensus with Zero-Degradation

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previously such one-step asynchronous consensus algorithms have been proposed for crash failure assumptions [2,3,4,5,6,7]; Friedman et al proposed a common coin-based one-step consensus algorithm that tolerates Byzantine failures and terminates with probability 1 but requires that the network scheduler has no knowledge of the common coin oracle [8]. In this paper, we consider one-step algorithms for Byzantine asynchronous consensus in the presence of a strong network adversary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously such one-step asynchronous consensus algorithms have been proposed for crash failure assumptions [2,3,4,5,6,7]; Friedman et al proposed a common coin-based one-step consensus algorithm that tolerates Byzantine failures and terminates with probability 1 but requires that the network scheduler has no knowledge of the common coin oracle [8]. In this paper, we consider one-step algorithms for Byzantine asynchronous consensus in the presence of a strong network adversary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aliph uses, besides the Backup instance used in AZyzzyva (to handle the cases with asynchrony/failures), two new instances: (i) Quorum, targeted for system conditions that do not involve asynchrony/failures/contention, and (ii) Chain, targeted for high-contention conditions without asynchrony/failures. Quorum has a very low latency (like, e.g., Brasileiro et al [2001], Abd-El-Malek et al [2005], and Dobre and Suri 2006]), and it makes Aliph the first BFT protocol to achieve a latency of only two message delays with as few as 3 f + 1 servers. Chain implements a pipeline message pattern and relies on a novel authentication technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mentioned protocols suffer from collisions (which results in degraded latency) when multiple commands are sent at about the same time. In our prior work [10] we have developed consensus protocols tackling this problem and degrading gracefully in the presence of collisions. Guerraoui and Raynal [14] have developed a gracefully degrading consensus protocol that quickly chooses a value accepted by a fixed quorum.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%