1947
DOI: 10.1097/00006534-194711000-00025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

One Stage Tubed Abdominal Flaps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1949
1949
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, it allows ap design in any direction according to the defect 2 location. Maximum size of the ap in our series was 216 cm which [3] was more than the ap described by Yilmaz et al but less than ap [28] 2…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, it allows ap design in any direction according to the defect 2 location. Maximum size of the ap in our series was 216 cm which [3] was more than the ap described by Yilmaz et al but less than ap [28] 2…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Hypogastric ap is an alternative to groin ap. However it is not [3] suitable for volar surface defect of forearm . To address these issues, [4] the pedicled paraumbilical ap based on perforators from deep inferior epigastric artery has come in to clinical practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatives to these are small distant flaps, such as groin flaps [3], abdominal wall flaps [4] and sometimes also homodigital pedicle flaps. Microsurgical reconstruction of the fingers, for example with free mini groin flaps [5] or lateral arm flaps, have been described [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are the groin flap, [22][23][24] superficial inferior epigastric artery flap, [25][26][27] paraumbilical perforator-based pedicled abdominal flap, 28,29 and lateral intercostal perforator-based pedicled abdominal flap. 30 The later 2 flaps are thick and left conspicuous donor scar 28,30 which may require skin grafting for donor site closure in up to 50% of cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%