2008
DOI: 10.1136/adc.2007.127951
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

One size does not fit all: getting drug doses right for children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(8 reference statements)
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the dosage ratios to adults based on BSA were between 1.09 and 1.10, almost the same as those of adults in this study. It was reported that although scaling methods based on BSA can be considered to overpredict clearance in neonates and infants after 6 months of age, BSA is a good marker as a basis of drug dosing 11,19 ; our results are consistent with those findings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…On the other hand, the dosage ratios to adults based on BSA were between 1.09 and 1.10, almost the same as those of adults in this study. It was reported that although scaling methods based on BSA can be considered to overpredict clearance in neonates and infants after 6 months of age, BSA is a good marker as a basis of drug dosing 11,19 ; our results are consistent with those findings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Our previous study showed that tripegfilgrastim 100 μg/kg reduced Grade 4 neutropenia and was generally tolerable in pediatric patients 19 . Although weight‐based dosing is frequently used, it has some disadvantages because of the inconvenience of administration and the nonlinear relationship between weight and dose 45,46 . Our simulation suggested that five weight‐tiered fixed doses of tripegfilgrastim achieved a similar reduction in Grade 4 neutropenia duration compared with weight‐based G‐CSF treatment with 100 μg/kg.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“… 19 Although weight‐based dosing is frequently used, it has some disadvantages because of the inconvenience of administration and the nonlinear relationship between weight and dose. 45 , 46 Our simulation suggested that five weight‐tiered fixed doses of tripegfilgrastim achieved a similar reduction in Grade 4 neutropenia duration compared with weight‐based G‐CSF treatment with 100 μg/kg. The median duration of Grade 4 neutropenia ranged from 6.3 to 7 days in the weight‐tiered fixed‐dose group, and the corresponding value was 6.5–7.2 days in the weight‐based dose group (Figure 5 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%