1986
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.161.1.3532182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

One-shot dual-energy subtraction imaging.

Abstract: Dual-energy subtraction imaging by a single x-ray exposure (one shot) can easily be performed by using computed radiography with scanning laser-stimulated luminescence. In a phantom study, a thin copper filter placed between two imaging plates produced a dual-energy subtracted image from a single x-ray exposure. One-shot dual-energy subtraction imaging was also useful in the diagnosis of thoracic lesions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
39
0
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
(1 reference statement)
0
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One method used for image processing is the energy subtraction method [1]. This involves acquiring images at two different x-ray energies:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…One method used for image processing is the energy subtraction method [1]. This involves acquiring images at two different x-ray energies:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low energy information is obtained from the imaging plate in front of a copper plate. High energy information is obtained from the imaging plate in back of the copper plate, as the metal filters out the low energy information [1][2][3][4].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Despite recent developments in CT techniques, difficulties remain, such as shifting of the slice level in thin-section CT images acquired during different breaths, and difficulty in clarifying the characteristics and distribution of calcifications relative to soft tissue components of the mass. Dual-energy digital radiography has been found useful in detecting calcifications [6,9,[15][16][17][18]. Projection images acquired using DES techniques, however, suffer from the problem of overlap of anatomic features (e.g., calcifications superimposed over the ribs or spine).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%