2002
DOI: 10.1039/b206598c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

One pot/two donors/one diol give one differentiated trisaccharide: powerful evidence for reciprocal donor–acceptor selectivity (RDAS)

Abstract: Three component, one-pot reactions involving equimolar amounts of the acceptor diol and both armed and disarmed donors presented simultaneously, produce a single double-differential glycosidation product; this phenomenon provides evidence for Reciprocal Donor Acceptor Selectivity (RDAS).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[42][43][44][45] Building on Paulsen notion that the reactivity of both reaction partners should be ''matched'' for an optimal glycosylation reaction, [46][47][48][49] Fraser-Reid coined the concept of reciprocal donor acceptor selectivity (RDAS), to account for these observations. [50][51][52][53] Although the concept still awaits a proper mechanistic explanation, the counter-intuitive outcome of several recent reactions have been related to this phenomenon. [54][55][56][57][58] To provide a satisfactory explanation for these observations, more insight is required into the intrinsic reactivity of (carbohydrate) acceptors and better (computational) methodology should be developed to assess the transition states of glycosylation reactions.…”
Section: Acceptormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[42][43][44][45] Building on Paulsen notion that the reactivity of both reaction partners should be ''matched'' for an optimal glycosylation reaction, [46][47][48][49] Fraser-Reid coined the concept of reciprocal donor acceptor selectivity (RDAS), to account for these observations. [50][51][52][53] Although the concept still awaits a proper mechanistic explanation, the counter-intuitive outcome of several recent reactions have been related to this phenomenon. [54][55][56][57][58] To provide a satisfactory explanation for these observations, more insight is required into the intrinsic reactivity of (carbohydrate) acceptors and better (computational) methodology should be developed to assess the transition states of glycosylation reactions.…”
Section: Acceptormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that context, we decided to evaluate axial vs axial preference with the glycosylation of diol 88 [93]. [94]. Attempts to elicit equatorial vs equatorial selectivity were only partially successful (with vicinal diols) when an NPOE was used as glycosyl donor, whereas armed donors were less discriminating [93,95].…”
Section: Secondary Versus Secondary Hydroxyl Groups In Diolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 With a number of different concepts for the one-pot synthesis, we chose the one-pot/one-addition method wherein all of the building blocks are present from the beginning. Invented by Kahne, 15 and further explored by Fraser-Reid 16 and Bols, 7 a this approach requires fine tuning of the reactivity to differentiate all of the reaction components. The general idea underpinning this approach is that the more reactive donor will react with the more reactive acceptor (hydroxyl).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%