2009
DOI: 10.1248/cpb.57.321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

One-Pot N-Arylation of Indoles Directly from N-Arylsulfonylindoles via Consecutive Deprotection and SNAr Reactions with Activated Aryl Halides

Abstract: An efficient one-pot step by step t-BuOK-mediated procedure for the synthesis of N-arylindoles has been developed in moderate to good yields. The protocol involves the consecutive deprotection of N-arylsulfonylindoles as latent indoles and subsequent SNAr reactions with activated aryl halides. This tandem reaction affords an efficient and convenient preparation of N-arylindoles that benefit from prior indoles protection by arylsulfonyl group, and can shorten a reaction sequence and improve synthetic efficiency. Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A modification of the protocol described by Xu et al using a high excess of K t BuO (7 eq.) instead of refluxing conditions allowed a fast deprotection at room temperature [33]. This approach gave intermediates 12a – d in satisfying purity and yields (64–77% over three steps), justifying the synthetic detour associated with the protection of the indole nitrogen.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A modification of the protocol described by Xu et al using a high excess of K t BuO (7 eq.) instead of refluxing conditions allowed a fast deprotection at room temperature [33]. This approach gave intermediates 12a – d in satisfying purity and yields (64–77% over three steps), justifying the synthetic detour associated with the protection of the indole nitrogen.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3‐Acylindole analogs ( 8 – 20 ) (12): A mixture of 3‐acyl‐ N ‐( p ‐toluenesulfonyl)indoles (1 mmol) and t ‐BuOK (1.8 mmol) in anhydrous tetrahydrofurame (THF) (5 mL) was stirred at reflux under argon. The progress of the reaction was monitored by TLC analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Twenty 3-acylindole analogs (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20) were screened in vitro for their antifungal activities against seven phytopathogenic fungi by poisoned food technique (8). Seven phytopathogenic fungi, namely Fusarium graminearum, Alternaria alternata, Bipolaris sorokinianum, Pyricularia oryzae, Fusarium oxysporum f. sp.…”
Section: Biological Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While it was relatively straightforward to identify deprotection conditions to selectively remove the Fmoc and t Bu moieties, identifying the right conditions for selective N -Ts deprotection proved to be considerably more challenging. The majority of the known reaction conditions for N -Ts deprotection led to deprotection of either the Fmoc or t Bu under basic or acidic conditions, respectively. , After numerous attempts, selective deprotection of N -Ts group on the 7-azatryptophan 3c was achieved by using a 0.1 M solution of SmI 2 in THF in the presence of pyrrolidine which furnished 4 in 78% isolated yield. The applications of the selectively deprotected Negishi products were further demonstrated in the synthesis of dipeptides at both C- and N-terminals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%