Understanding the catalyst-support interactions provides mechanistic information about how the catalytic reaction takes place. Both CuO-CeO2 and Cu-CeO2 have been reported to have high catalytic activity to promote carbon monoxide oxidation, water-gas shift reaction, and methanol steam reforming. This can be attributed to the quick reversible Ce 4+ /Ce 3+ redox couple, Cu 2+ /Cu + /Cu 0 redox triple, and the CuOx-CeO2-x interactions during the redox processes [1]. The redox functionality of both catalyst and support are vital components for gas adsorption, oxygen migration at the metal-support interface and in the catalytic reactions mentioned above. To further understand CuOx-CeO2 interfacial effect, we report a comparative study on CeO2 nanorod-supported CuO and Cu catalysts for CO oxidation.CeO2 nanorods were prepared using a hydrothermal method [2][3][4]. Typically 0.1M Ce(NO3)36H2O and 6M NaOH mixtures were heated to 90~130 °C and held for 48 hrs in a sealed 200 mL Teflon-lined autoclave (~50 % fill). Then the autoclave was cooled to room temperature before the solid products were recovered by suction filtration. The materials were washed thoroughly with distilled water to remove any co-precipitated salts, then washed with ethanol to avoid hard agglomeration in the nanoparticles, and dried in air at 50 °C for 12 hrs. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) characterization was performed using a JEOL 2100 operated at 200 kV and equipped with an EDAX detector and annular dark-field detector. Hydrogen temperature programmed reduction (H2-TPR) study was examined using hydrogen chemisorption on the Quantachrome iQ and Micrometrics 2920 to explore how much hydrogen adsorbs as a function of temperature. The catalytic oxidation of CO was conducted by using a fixed bed plug flow reactor system. 1vol%CO/20vol%O2/79vol%He with a 70 mL/min flow rate was supplied through mass flow controller and passed through the catalyst bed. The catalyst (~100 mg) was mixed with quartz wool (coarse, 9 μm) and filled in the quartz tube reactor. The reaction temperature was programmed between room temperature and 350 o C and monitored by thermocouple. The reactant CO and product CO2 were analyzed by using an on-line gas chromatograph (SRI multiple gas analyzer GC, 8610C chassis) system. Shown in Figure 1, the HRTEM images of CeO2 nanorods clearly suggest a {111} termination surface with a significant amount of defects, including steps, voids, lattice distortion, twining, and bending. The data thus obtained are inconsistent with those available in the literature [5], claiming a rod geometry with two {001} and two {011} surfaces, although the {001} surface was occasionally observed in the present study. By exposing these more "defected" crystal planes, CeO2 nanorods have a much higher surface reduction percentage than their conventional octahedrally shaped counterparts with {111} crystal planes. H2-TPR (Figure 1) shows that a larger percentage of the reduction takes place in the lower temperature surface reduction area. Figure 1 also com...