2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“One Man, One Dollar”? Campaign contribution limits, equal influence, and political communication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only a few other papers have examined the impact of campaign finance composition on voter behavior. Vanberg (2008) and Stratmann (2008) support the prediction that voters respond to advertising di↵erently between special interest and publicly-financed campaigns.…”
supporting
confidence: 55%
“…Only a few other papers have examined the impact of campaign finance composition on voter behavior. Vanberg (2008) and Stratmann (2008) support the prediction that voters respond to advertising di↵erently between special interest and publicly-financed campaigns.…”
supporting
confidence: 55%
“…Only a few other papers have examined the impact of campaign finance composition on voter behavior. Vanberg (2008) captured by any one group and are preferred by voters. However, they admit that their empirical strategy cannot rule out that causality runs other way: candidates with a higher likelihood of winning may attract a wider pattern of contributions 9 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More importantly, Vanberg (2008) found that the winner of an election has a favorable advertising characteristic. To examine this argument, another important issue related to the role of money in elections concerns the relationship between the amounts a candidate spends on advertising and whether or not that candidate wins or loses.…”
Section: Estimation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%