2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10732-011-9192-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

One hyper-heuristic approach to two timetabling problems in health care

Abstract: We present one general high-level hyper-heuristic approach for addressing two timetabling problems in the health care domain: the patient admission scheduling problem and the nurse rostering problem. The complex combinatorial problem of patient admission scheduling has only recently been introduced to the research community. In addition to the instance that was introduced on this occasion, we present a new set of benchmark instances. Nurse rostering, on the other hand, is a well studied operations research pro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although various benchmark sets exist for well-known combinatorial optimization problems, for healthcare planning and scheduling there only exist various benchmark sets for nurse scheduling (Brucker et al 2010;Musliu et al 2004;Vanhoucke and Maenhout 2009) and patient admission scheduling (Bilgin et al 2012). Typically, these benchmark sets, such as NSPLib (Vanhoucke and Maenhout 2009), are not real-world-based instances but are generated randomly.…”
Section: Benchmark Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although various benchmark sets exist for well-known combinatorial optimization problems, for healthcare planning and scheduling there only exist various benchmark sets for nurse scheduling (Brucker et al 2010;Musliu et al 2004;Vanhoucke and Maenhout 2009) and patient admission scheduling (Bilgin et al 2012). Typically, these benchmark sets, such as NSPLib (Vanhoucke and Maenhout 2009), are not real-world-based instances but are generated randomly.…”
Section: Benchmark Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first competition, three tracks were presented, based on the available running time of the algorithms, including mall, medium, and large sized instances to solve (Haspeslagh et al 2014). A patient admission scheduling benchmark set (Bilgin et al 2012) has been generated on the basis of a single reallife instance from Demeester et al (2010). Since only limited real-life data were available, Ceschia and Schaerf (2016) presented a benchmark set for patient admission scheduling, together with an instance generator, solution validator, and first solutions.…”
Section: Benchmark Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors proposed a hybrid tabu search algorithm to solve this problem. The same instances have subsequently been considered by Ceschia and Schaerf [7], Bilgin et al [8], and Range et al [9]. The first two contributions also consider local search based heuristics, while the last describes a column generation based heuristic approach combined with constraint aggregation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remaining work in this area, Demeester et al [2010], Bilgin et al [2012], Ceschia and Schaerf [2011], all consider the same version of PAS. This definition of the PAS problem was originally presented in Demeester et al [2010].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%