One Hundred Tenth Critical Bibliography of the History of Science and Its Cultural Influences

Neu, John

doi:10.1086/354035

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Table 1 provides the numbers of documents and references, citing and cited for the years 1974–2008. The rightmost column reveals that in some years (e.g., 1985–1987) the numbers of cited references in journals citing articles published in Leonardo were very high. This is caused by the inclusion of bibliographies.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This is caused by the inclusion of bibliographies. For example, "The One Hundred Tenth Critical Bibliography of the History of Science and Its Cultural Influences," published as a special issue of ISIS (Neu, 1985), contained 6,269 references. In our opinion, this huge effect of bibliographies can be considered as a potential source of distortion in the citation patterns in the arts and humanities (although this effect may also occur in the SCI and SSCI).…”

Section: Number Of Citing Documentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Maps on the basis of the Arts & Humanities Citation Index: The journals Leonardo and Art Journal versus “digital humanities” as a topic

Leydesdorff

Salah

2010

J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The possibilities of using the Arts & Humanities Citation Index (A&HCI) for journal mapping have not been sufficiently recognized because of the absence of a Journal Citations Report (JCR) for this database. A quasi‐JCR for the A&HCI (2008) was constructed from the data contained in the Web of Science and is used for the evaluation of two journals as examples: Leonardo and Art Journal. The maps on the basis of the aggregated journal–journal citations within this domain can be compared with maps including references to journals in the Science Citation Index and Social Science Citation Index. Art journals are cited by (social) science journals more than by other art journals, but these journals draw upon one another in terms of their own references. This cultural impact in terms of being cited is not found when documents with a topic such as “digital humanities” are analyzed. This community of practice functions more as an intellectual organizer than a journal.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Number Of Citing Documentsmentioning

confidence: 99%