2019
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.5799
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

One-hour Recovery Time in Subjects Undergoing Percutaneous Liver Biopsy: A Quality Improvement and Patient Safety Project

Abstract: IntroductionLiver biopsy is the gold standard in diagnosing, staging and guiding clinical management in liver disease. There are currently no standard guidelines for liver biopsy recovery time. The aims of this project are to study the safety of a one-hour recovery time after percutaneous liver biopsies and to measure the rate of complications and identify risk factors.MethodsA total of 500 consecutive subjects who underwent a percutaneous liver biopsy at a single-center teaching institution (Brooke Army Medic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The duration of monitoring will be up to 8 hours, but for the low-risk patient with no post-biopsy complications, 3 hours' observation is usually adequate, 119 although one recent study suggested that 1 hour is enough to recognise all major complications. 185 Liver biopsy observations include monitoring the patient's pulse rate and blood pressure every 15 min for the first hour, 119 then every 30 min for 2 hours and then hourly for the remaining period. If the patient is hypotensive or tachycardic then they should receive 500 mL of 0.9% saline, unless contraindicated, and then re-evaluated.…”
Section: After the Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The duration of monitoring will be up to 8 hours, but for the low-risk patient with no post-biopsy complications, 3 hours' observation is usually adequate, 119 although one recent study suggested that 1 hour is enough to recognise all major complications. 185 Liver biopsy observations include monitoring the patient's pulse rate and blood pressure every 15 min for the first hour, 119 then every 30 min for 2 hours and then hourly for the remaining period. If the patient is hypotensive or tachycardic then they should receive 500 mL of 0.9% saline, unless contraindicated, and then re-evaluated.…”
Section: After the Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The duration of monitoring will be up to 8 hours, but for the low-risk patient with no post-biopsy complications, 3 hours' observation is usually adequate, 119 although one recent study suggested that 1 hour is enough to recognise all major complications. 185 …”
Section: Clinical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional studies emphasized the type of needle used, gauge size of biopsy needle, and utilization of image guidance for liver biopsies, as all of these factors can increase complication rates (Bicknell et al, 2002; Chi et al, 2017; Liane et al, 2019; Tublin et al, 2018). Larger gauge needles, 14 and 16 gauge, have been shown to pose more of a risk for complications (Bicknell et al, 2002; Liane et al, 2019; Maheux et al, 2019; Mueller et al, 2012; Tublin et al, 2018).…”
Section: Evidence-based Literature Review and Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When considering practice changes, the effects on safety are paramount and should be supported by evidence-based literature. Seven published studies included research on patients who have shorter recovery times without negatively affecting their comfort or safety (Beddy et al, 2007; Bicknell, Richenberg, Cooperberg, Tiwari, & Halperin, 2002; Firpi et al, 2005; Liane, Dooley, Sarkar, Paredes, & Morales-Cardona, 2019; Nodarse-Perez et al, 2016; Patel & Bowman, 2018; Quaile & Dulhunty, 2017). Firpi et al (2005) included 3,214 study participants who underwent an outpatient liver biopsy procedure.…”
Section: Evidence-based Literature Review and Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,9 Even though hepatomegaly and hepatosteatosis are frequently observed in abdominal imaging performed for other reasons in SLE patients, the majority of these cases are not evaluated further since the gold standard for diagnosis is liver biopsy, an invasive procedure associated with a number of serious complications. 10 Therefore, the prognostic significance of NAFLD and liver fibrosis is still largely unknown in these patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%