2016
DOI: 10.1186/s40494-016-0092-3
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

One heritage corrosion product less: basic sodium copper carbonate

Abstract: Basic sodium copper carbonate, Na 3 [Cu 2 (CO 3 ) 3 (OH)]•4H 2 O, has been mentioned as heritage corrosion product of copper alloys in two publications. The identification relied on the comparison of the powder diffractograms with ICDD 28-1048. But this erroneous reference card clearly measured chalconatronite, Na 2 Cu(CO 3 ) 2 •3H 2 O, instead which is indeed the product formed in the synthesis on which the card is based. Therefore, ICDD 28-1048 should be deleted.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite being a resourceful collector of compounds, SCOTT missed (and from hindsight, rightfully) an arcane basic sodium copper(II) carbonate, Na 3 [Cu 2 (CO 3 ) 3 (OH)]•4H 2 O (ICDD 00-28-1084), which was listed-without any further information-as a corrosion product identified through powder diffraction ( [32],: 167) on a cover glass of a daguerréotype (photosensitised silver layer on copper). Through synthesis experiments and the evaluation of XRPD peak lists and FTIR spectra, we could prove [33] that the postulated compound [34] is nothing other than chalconatronite; consequently, ICDD have now deleted this chart. Therefore, the listing by Barger and White [32] can now be taken as further proof of chalconatronite on another group of combined glass/metal objects.…”
Section: Rare Copper Carbonatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite being a resourceful collector of compounds, SCOTT missed (and from hindsight, rightfully) an arcane basic sodium copper(II) carbonate, Na 3 [Cu 2 (CO 3 ) 3 (OH)]•4H 2 O (ICDD 00-28-1084), which was listed-without any further information-as a corrosion product identified through powder diffraction ( [32],: 167) on a cover glass of a daguerréotype (photosensitised silver layer on copper). Through synthesis experiments and the evaluation of XRPD peak lists and FTIR spectra, we could prove [33] that the postulated compound [34] is nothing other than chalconatronite; consequently, ICDD have now deleted this chart. Therefore, the listing by Barger and White [32] can now be taken as further proof of chalconatronite on another group of combined glass/metal objects.…”
Section: Rare Copper Carbonatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to modern diffractograms, the angle measurements were not precise and stopped at 2Θ = 51 • , and the intensities were only estimated visually. To analyse complex mixtures, it should now be replaced by high quality data derived from the crystal structure, e.g., ICDD 01-71-1490 ( [33], Table I), covering a larger range with truly quantitative values for intensities. Such a re-evaluation could possibly solve the riddle of chalconatronite, which has been reported as a minor component together with quartz, atacamite, and cuprite in the outer concretion of the Riace Warrior A, recovered from the sea off Calabria (SCOTT 120, 328; [35]).…”
Section: Rare Copper Carbonatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the latter case, the corrosion product was originally identified as Na 3 [Cu 2 (CO 3 ) 3 (OH)]•4H 2 O, ICDD 00-28-1084 [27] based on the original publication of this compound [28]. Evaluation of their XRD peak list and their FTIR spectra and own synthesis experiments proved that the compound was nothing other than chalconatronite [29]. Consequently, ICDD deleted the chart.…”
Section: Kpb2(co3)2(oh) ②mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7: Corrosion on a nickel silver reflector (p-RFA: ca 60% Cu, 24% Zn, 13% Ni) of a miner's lamp in contact with glass: chalconatronite and a basic zinc copper formate (see below), photo: A. Schorpp, ABK Despite being a resourceful collector of compounds, SCOTT missed (and from hindsight, rightfully) an arcane basic sodium copper(II) carbonate: Na3[Cu2(CO3)3(OH)]•4H2O (ICDD 00-28-1084) was listedwithout any further information -as a corrosion product identified by powder diffraction (Barger and White 1991: 167) on a cover glass of a daguerréotype (photosensitised silver layer on copper). By synthesis experiments and evaluation of XRPD peak lists and FTIR spectra, we could prove (Eggert et al 2016) that the postulated compound (Sengupta and Nandi 1974) is nothing other than also chalconatronite; consequently, ICDD now deleted this chart. Therefore, the listing by Barger and White can now be taken as another proof for chalconatronite on another group of combined glass/metal objects.…”
Section: Rare Copper Carbonatesmentioning
confidence: 99%