2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10584-014-1266-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

One effect to rule them all? A comment on climate and conflict

Abstract: A recent Climatic Change review article reports a remarkable convergence of scientific evidence for a link between climatic events and violent intergroup conflict, thus departing markedly from other contemporary assessments of the empirical literature. This commentary revisits the review in order to understand the discrepancy. We believe the origins of the disagreement can be traced back to the review article's underlying quantitative meta-analysis,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
98
1
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 186 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
98
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The question whether or not climate-related factors have significantly contributed to recent armed-conflict outbreaks has been heavily disputed in the scientific literature (33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38). Although a sequence of studies has suggested that a large number of outbreaks of armed conflicts in modern as well as premodern times have been associated with climatic variability (33,36,37,(39)(40)(41), the robustness of these findings and underlying mechanisms are controversially discussed (10,37,42,43).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The question whether or not climate-related factors have significantly contributed to recent armed-conflict outbreaks has been heavily disputed in the scientific literature (33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38). Although a sequence of studies has suggested that a large number of outbreaks of armed conflicts in modern as well as premodern times have been associated with climatic variability (33,36,37,(39)(40)(41), the robustness of these findings and underlying mechanisms are controversially discussed (10,37,42,43).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to this study, one standard deviation increase in temperature or extreme rainfall increases the frequency of interpersonal violence by 4% and increases inter-group conflict by 14% (Hsiang, Burke, and Miguel, 2013). But other studies question this research, underlining the mixed and inconclusive results from scientific research on climate change and conflict (Buhaug et al, 2014).…”
Section: Environmental Dimensionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…This was criticized by for three main reasons: (i) data overlap in the metaanalysis; (ii) assuming causal homogeneity across different independent and dependent variables, spatial and temporal scales, time-lags, and functional forms; and (iii) excluding replication studies and oversampling of significant results. A meta-analysis adjusting for this failed to find evidence of convergence [38]. Subsequent exchanges showed few signs of agreement, with Hsiang, Burke and Miguel (2014) pointing out that most critical points were addressed in the initial study [39], and Buhaug and Nordkvelle (2014) arguing that the original modeling strategy was inappropriate [40].…”
Section: The Climate-conflict Debate Pre-2014mentioning
confidence: 99%