2014
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109667
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

One Dose versus Three Weekly Doses of Benzathine Penicillin G for Patients Co-Infected with HIV and Early Syphilis: A Multicenter, Prospective Observational Study

Abstract: BackgroundOne dose of benzathine penicillin G (BPG) has been recommended for HIV-infected patients with early syphilis (primary, secondary, and early latent syphilis) in the sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, but clinical data to support such a recommendation are limited.MethodsWe prospectively observed the serological response to 1 or 3 weekly doses of BPG in HIV-infected adults who sought treatment of early syphilis at 8 hospitals around Taiwan. Rapid plasma reagin (RPR) titers were followed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
43
2
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(19 reference statements)
2
43
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, the 101 HIV-infected patients enrolled in the trial responded less well serologically, but due to loss to follow up the study was underpowered to detect a two-fold difference in standard versus enhanced treatment in HIV co-infected patients. Furthermore, a large ( n =573) prospective observational study in Taiwan found no difference between single-dose benzathine penicillin G and enhanced treatment in a per-protocol analysis 199 . However, using a last-observed-carried-forward analysis to account for missing data, the authors concluded that 67.1% of those who received one dose responded serologically compared with 74.8%who received the enhanced treatment, a statistically significant difference ( P =0.044) 199 .…”
Section: Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, the 101 HIV-infected patients enrolled in the trial responded less well serologically, but due to loss to follow up the study was underpowered to detect a two-fold difference in standard versus enhanced treatment in HIV co-infected patients. Furthermore, a large ( n =573) prospective observational study in Taiwan found no difference between single-dose benzathine penicillin G and enhanced treatment in a per-protocol analysis 199 . However, using a last-observed-carried-forward analysis to account for missing data, the authors concluded that 67.1% of those who received one dose responded serologically compared with 74.8%who received the enhanced treatment, a statistically significant difference ( P =0.044) 199 .…”
Section: Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of note, however, was the finding by Yang et al, which suggested a possible benefit of three doses of BP-G by reporting a longer time to serologic treatment failure in this group (37). However, the authors described a number of limitations to the study that could potentially explain the difference in their findings relative to other studies: 1) the study was not a RCT; 2) the decision to use one vs three doses was made by physicians assessing the patients; 3) 25% had missing RPR titres on followup testing; 4) the researchers could not definitely differentiate between re-infection and treatment failure; and, 5) the majority of patients were men who have sex with men (MSM) which limited the generalizability of their findings to other populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…In the included studies, serologic response was commonly defined as ≥4 fold reduction in RPR titres at 12 months. The time to the first episode of serological failure appeared shorter in the group that received one dose: 1,184 (40 months) days for one-dose group and 1,436 days (almost 48 months) in the three-dose group, suggesting benefit from a three-dose regimen (37). In the same study, a Kaplan-Meier survival plot model showed a statistically significant longer mean time to failure in the group that received three-dose regimen (p=0.03) (37).…”
Section: Serologic Responsementioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations