Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2020
DOI: 10.1145/3313831.3376766
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

One does not Simply RSVP: Mental Workload to Select Speed Reading Parameters using Electroencephalography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The positive results achieved using theta band EEG features might be explained by the importance of this frequency band for successful semantic processing. Theta power is expected to rise with increasing language processing activity (Kosch et al, 2020 ). Various studies have shown that theta oscillations are related to semantic memory retrieval and can be task-specific (e.g., Bastiaansen et al, 2005 ; Giraud and Poeppel, 2012 ; Marko et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The positive results achieved using theta band EEG features might be explained by the importance of this frequency band for successful semantic processing. Theta power is expected to rise with increasing language processing activity (Kosch et al, 2020 ). Various studies have shown that theta oscillations are related to semantic memory retrieval and can be task-specific (e.g., Bastiaansen et al, 2005 ; Giraud and Poeppel, 2012 ; Marko et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computer games [85], [103], [104] were included in the low-noise category. Data presentation tasks, visual [105]- [108] or auditory [109]- [111], and multiple learning tasks [13], [18], [112], [113], including code comprehension tasks [114]- [116] and mathematical tasks [117]- [120], were categorized as low-noise ones. Additionally, dual tasks with low noise were a Tetris game coupled with an oddball task [121], a Stroop task coupled with an oddball task [122], a SIMKAP task [123], and a threefold task performed on a computer and a customized AR system [14].…”
Section: A Rq (A): Classification Of Cognitive Load Experiments Based...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Epoching in particular was documented as an early step in preprocessing [14], [107], [109], [110], [117], [129], yet most studies applied it as a later step after basic filtering [101], [122], [138] or after filtering and BSS algorithms [93]- [96], [99], [100], [106], [112], [121], [125]- [127], [135], [139], [141]. Overlapping was rare, with an overlapping percentage of 80% [38]or 50% [105]. Regarding the epoch duration, short epochs of 1second were preferred for rapid changes in EEG data [96], [105], [112], [121], [122], [124], [138] with a time interval approximately 200ms before stimulus presentation until 800ms after stimulus presentation [14], [96], [109], [121], [122], [138].…”
Section: ) How Was Standard Preprocessing Executed In Semi-automated ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Placebo-Control 4 [35,71,97,111] Placebo Study 12 [18,20,22,23,28,82,100,107,110,110] Acknowledge Placebo Effects as a Confound 11 [1,7,10,21,47,64,74,83,86,91,94,105] modalities. For example, one can adapt letter presentation in an E-reader to alpha oscillations; an indicator of workload in the electroencephalogram [55], reduce the number of interaction possibilities with the number of errors made by the user [45], or adapt the interface to the mood of the user [61]. Further examples include the user's context [90] and their interaction performance as well as their physiology [56] serving as implicit measurements for user interface adaptations.…”
Section: Category N Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The availability of large-scale user data allowed recent advances in machine learning and neural networks to make robust predictions about user-related issues during interaction. This includes adaptations based on the user's perceived workload [53][54][55], emotions [5,52], and interaction difficulties due to the complex visualization of UI elements [51]. AI-based adaptive interfaces optimize usability by linking the system design to user input [43], where the overall goal of user interface adaptations is the improvement of the interaction efficiency and perceived usability [43].…”
Section: Category N Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%