‘One cigarette for you and one for me’: children of smoking and non-smoking parents during pretend play

Leeuw, Rebecca N. H. de; Verhagen, Maaike; Wit, Cindy de; Engels, Rutger C. M. E.

doi:10.1136/tc.2010.039909

Cited by 8 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 32 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…That children engage in such behaviour during play has been demonstrated in other studies and has been found to be positively associated with parental smoking; but as was the case in this study, children of non-smokers also engaged in the behaviour [32,33]. Likewise, although parental smoking [34,35] and permitting smoking in their home [36][37][38] are associated with increased risk of youth smoking, some children may smoke despite having non-smoking parents [39,40] and smoke-free homes [39].…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 43%

Education is the key to protecting children against smoking: What parents think and do

Small¹,

Brennan-Hunter²

2014

OJN

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this study was to examine parents' communication with their children about the topic of smoking. A qualitative descriptive design was used. Twenty-nine parents who lived in rural communities and who had children in kindergarten to Grade 6 were interviewed. The data were analyzed for themes. A large majority of parents communicated with their children about smoking through verbal interaction, using any one of three approaches: discussing smoking with their children, telling their children about smoking, or acknowledging their children's understanding of smoking. Those parents also had shown disapproval of smoking, which took different forms and varied from explicit messages in their verbal communication to implicit messages in their behaviours. Three parents had not verbally communicated at all with their children about smoking. Overall, the parents' communication patterns with their children varied in terms of quality and coherence with recommendations in the literature.

show abstract

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 43%

Education is the key to protecting children against smoking: What parents think and do

Small¹,

Brennan-Hunter²

2014

OJN

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Research at home and abroad have recognized that the in uencing factors of adult smoking includes gender [8][9][10][11] , marital status [12,13] , educational level [14] , economic level [15] , social networks [16,17] , health status [18,19] , mental illness [20][21][22] , alcohol/drug abuse and dependence [23][24][25][26] , race/ethnicity [27] work pressure [28,29] , and so on. Moreover, Hu et al [30] and Li et al [31] pointed out that the effect of skipping breakfast, short sleep duration, and whether to participate in recreational activities and physical exercises regularly on the smoking behavior of rural residents was signi cant.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The influencing factors of the smoking behavior of online ride-hailing drivers in China: A cross-sectional analysis

Chen

et al. 2021

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background：Online ride-hailing is a fast-developing new travel mode, and tobacco control policies on it have not yet been improved. This study aims to reveal the smoking status and influencing factors of ride-hailing drivers, so as to provide a basis for the formulation of tobacco control policies.Methods：The cross-sectional data used in this study were derived from an online survey of full-time ride-hailing drivers in China. Questionnaires were employed to collect variables including sociodemographic and work-related characteristics, health status, health behavior, health literacy, and smoking status. Chi-Square test and multivariate logistic regression were used to analyze the influencing factors of current smoking.Results：A total of 8990 ride-hailing drivers were investigated, in which 5024 were current smokers, accounted to 55.9%. Current smokers (53.7% (2696/5024) v 44.2% (1752/3966); P<0.001) and drivers who smoked on the car (85.8% (1389/1618) v 38.4 (1307/3406); P<0.001) were more likely to allow passengers to smoke. Logistic regression analysis showed that men (OR=0.519, 95%CI (0.416, 0.647)), central regions (OR=1.172, 95%CI (1.049, 1.309)), eastern regions (OR=1.330, 95%CI (1.194, 1.480)), working at both daytime and night (OR=1.287, 95%CI (1.164, 1.424)), and working at non-fixed time (OR=0.847, 95%CI (0.718, 0.999)), 35-54 years old (OR=0.585, 95%CI (0.408, 0.829)), current drinker (OR=1.663, 95%CI (1.526, 1.813)), eating very irregularly (OR=1.370, 95%CI (1.233, 1.523)), the number of days a week of engaging in at least 10 minutes of moderate or vigorous exercise ≥ 3 (OR=0.752, 95%CI (0.646, 0.875)), taking the initiative to acquire health knowledge occasionally (OR=0.882, 95%CI (0.783, 0.992)) or frequently (OR=0.675, 95%CI (0.591, 0.770)) , underweight (OR=1.249, 95%CI (1.001, 1.559)) and overweight (OR=0.846, 95%CI (0.775, 0.924)) were associated with the prevalence of current smoking among online ride-hailing drivers (P<0.05). Conclusions：The smoking rate of ride-hailing drivers was high, and the social demographic and work-related characteristics, and health-related factors all affected their smoking behavior. Tobacco control measures targeted at online-hailing drivers should correct their cultural beliefs about smoking, increase their health literacy, guide them to exercise more and keep a regular schedule, as well as combine with drinking intervention and weight intervention.

show abstract

“…Although most attention has focused on reducing SHS in homes to protect children’s health, there are some examples in the literature addressing the significance of children’s vicarious learning about cigarette use in family contexts (Dalton et al, 2005; de Leeuw, Verhagen, de Wit, Scholte, & Engels, 2011; Jackson & Henrikson, 1997). Supported by longstanding evidence that confirms new behaviors are acquired through social learning (Bandura, 1986), this research points to the influence of parental modeling of smoking as well as parental communication, rule setting, and other socialization practices on children’s perceptions of smoking (Bandura; Dalton et al, 2005).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Reconciling Parenting and Smoking in the Context of Child Development

et al. 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this article we explore the micro-social context of parental tobacco use in the first years of a child's life and early childhood. We conducted individual interviews with 28 mothers and fathers during the 4 years following the birth of their child. Using grounded theory methods, we identified the predominant explanatory concept in parents' accounts as the need to reconcile being a parent and smoking. Desires to become smoke-free coexisted with five types of parent-child interactions: (a) protecting the defenseless child, (b) concealing smoking and cigarettes from the mimicking child, (c) reinforcing smoking as bad with the communicative child, (d) making guilt-driven promises to the fearful child, and (e) relinquishing personal responsibility to the autonomous child. We examine the agency of the child in influencing parents' smoking practices, the importance of children's observational learning in the early years, and the reciprocal nature of parent-child interactions related to parents' smoking behavior.

show abstract

‘One cigarette for you and one for me’: children of smoking and non-smoking parents during pretend play

Cited by 8 publications

References 32 publications

Education is the key to protecting children against smoking: What parents think and do

Education is the key to protecting children against smoking: What parents think and do

The influencing factors of the smoking behavior of online ride-hailing drivers in China: A cross-sectional analysis

Reconciling Parenting and Smoking in the Context of Child Development

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About