2001
DOI: 10.1029/2000ja000329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

One‐ and two‐dimensional simulations of electron beam instability: Generation of electrostatic and electromagnetic 2fp waves

Abstract: Abstract. We have performed computer simulations of the self-consistent nonlinear evolution of electrostatic and electromagnetic 2fp waves excited by electron beams with electromagnetic particle code. In both one-and two-dimensional periodic systems an electrostatic 2fp wave is generated at twice the wave number of

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

14
83
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
14
83
3
Order By: Relevance
“…We propose that the demonstrated sensitivity, particularly to beam density, is the underlying explanation as to why Ganse et al (2012b) have reported being able to find no evidence consistent with plasma emission in PIC simulations. Furthermore, we caution that as previous studies such as Kasaba et al (2001), Umeda (2010) have interpreted their results as signs of emission in similar parameter regimes to Run 2 but not reported on noise thresholds, it is unclear if such systems actually generate efficient plasma emission that is compatible with observed radio emission. Indeed, typical setups (with dense beams) are closer to those used in Run 2 (i.e., the case where we find limited evidence for fundamental emission, and no evidence for harmonic emission).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We propose that the demonstrated sensitivity, particularly to beam density, is the underlying explanation as to why Ganse et al (2012b) have reported being able to find no evidence consistent with plasma emission in PIC simulations. Furthermore, we caution that as previous studies such as Kasaba et al (2001), Umeda (2010) have interpreted their results as signs of emission in similar parameter regimes to Run 2 but not reported on noise thresholds, it is unclear if such systems actually generate efficient plasma emission that is compatible with observed radio emission. Indeed, typical setups (with dense beams) are closer to those used in Run 2 (i.e., the case where we find limited evidence for fundamental emission, and no evidence for harmonic emission).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…In the most extreme, some authors interpret the results of their experiments as evidence supporting the three-wave based mechanisms (Kasaba et al 2001;Umeda 2010), whereas others report that the such processes do not proceed in their simulations, and rather must invoke different mechanisms to produce emission; such as the requirement for a counter-propagating beam (Ganse et al 2012b(Ganse et al ,a, 2014Timofeev & Annenkov 2014), or linear mode conversion off density inhomogeneities as per Sakai et al (2005). Although, note that in the latter work they did not present results for a homogeneous setup, so arguably the underlying process responsible for emission in their work is not conclusively demonstrated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the essential theoretical framework based upon EM weak turbulence theory, which describes the entire process starting from the beam-generated Langmuir turbulence to the radiation generation, was available, complete numerical solution of the entire set of EM weak turbulence equations have not been done until quite recently, when Ziebell et al (2014aZiebell et al ( ,b,c, 2015 numerically solved the complete equations of EM weak turbulence theory for the first time. It should be mentioned that a few authors carried out direct EM particle-in-cell (PIC) simulations to characterize the nonlinear behavior of the plasma emission process (Kasaba et al 2001;Karlický & Vandas 2007;Rhee et al 2009a,b;Umeda 2010;Ganse et al 2012aGanse et al ,b, 2014. The full numerical solution of the analytical EM weak turbulence equations by Ziebell et al (2014aZiebell et al ( , 2015 complements these PIC simulation efforts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) Full kinetic simulation approach of type III bursts (Kasaba, Matsumoto, and Omura, 2001;Sakai, Kitamoto, and Saito, 2005;Rhee et al, 2009;Umeda, 2010) to this date used Particle-In-Cell (PIC) numerical method. This effort is mainly focused on understanding of basic physics rather than direct comparison with the observations because the size of simulation domain of the models corresponds to only few 1000 Debye lengths which is roughly 1/10 10 th of 1 AU.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%