2017
DOI: 10.1038/srep46290
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

OncoScore: a novel, Internet-based tool to assess the oncogenic potential of genes

Abstract: The complicated, evolving landscape of cancer mutations poses a formidable challenge to identify cancer genes among the large lists of mutations typically generated in NGS experiments. The ability to prioritize these variants is therefore of paramount importance. To address this issue we developed OncoScore, a text-mining tool that ranks genes according to their association with cancer, based on available biomedical literature. Receiver operating characteristic curve and the area under the curve (AUC) metrics … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To globally assess the potential role of RBPs in BC versus well-known BC genes, we first interrogated the Breast Invasive Carcinoma (TCGA, PanCancer Atlas) 510 database for genomic alterations of RBPs (n=1392), BC genes (n=171) 30 and non-cancer genes (n=170) 31 (Supp. Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To globally assess the potential role of RBPs in BC versus well-known BC genes, we first interrogated the Breast Invasive Carcinoma (TCGA, PanCancer Atlas) 510 database for genomic alterations of RBPs (n=1392), BC genes (n=171) 30 and non-cancer genes (n=170) 31 (Supp. Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-cancer gene list, related to Fig.1A, was constructed as follow: non-cancer genes from Piazza et al . 31 , without RBPs and NCG6 30 cancer genes, were reanalyzed using Piazza’s OncoScore algorithm (http://www.galseq.com/oncoscore.html), giving a final list of 177 non-cancer genes (Supp. Table S1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We analyzed five gene sets in order to compare the frequency mean of genomic alterations among them. The first gene set (n = 177) was integrated by the non-cancer genes 113 . We calculated the OncoScore of non-cancer genes, taking out all genes from our study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We analyzed five gene sets in order to compare the average frequency of genetic alterations among them. The first gene set (n = 177) was integrated by the non-cancer genes 96 . We calculated the OncoScore of non-cancer genes, taking out all genes from our study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%