2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2016.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oncological and functional results of robotic salvage radical prostatectomy after permanent brachytherapy implants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As IMRT made radiation field reduction on the peri‐prostate and reduction in fibrotic change and adhesion around the prostate tissue possible, we neither had any difficulty performing RARC nor observed any postoperative complications. Although not many case series of salvage RARP after brachytherapy or proton therapy were reported, several studies suggested feasible outcomes in complications and functional outcomes . Moreover, the patient achieved QOL improvement 6 months following RARC in the global, physical, cognitive, emotional, social nausea, sleep, appetite loss, and constipation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As IMRT made radiation field reduction on the peri‐prostate and reduction in fibrotic change and adhesion around the prostate tissue possible, we neither had any difficulty performing RARC nor observed any postoperative complications. Although not many case series of salvage RARP after brachytherapy or proton therapy were reported, several studies suggested feasible outcomes in complications and functional outcomes . Moreover, the patient achieved QOL improvement 6 months following RARC in the global, physical, cognitive, emotional, social nausea, sleep, appetite loss, and constipation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, a previous study that investigated the safety of RARC in patients with previous history of pelvic irradiation concluded that complication rates were not differ between the patients with and without pelvic radiation . In addition, recent study for salvage RARP after radiation therapy suggested low complications rates including rectal injuries (<2%) . A robotic procedure can overcome the difficulty of separation between the prostate and rectum.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The follow-up in the current series is relatively short after sRP, however considering these patients are very-high risk populations, failures are more likely to occur soon after local therapy. The advantage of using robotic platform in this cohort of complex operations needs to be further explored [ 16 17 ]. Overall, it is important to reemphasize the complexity of sRP following multiple local treatments; while cancer control appears excellent this must be balanced by concerns of surgical morbidity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Median age at the time of RP was 65 years (IQR: 61-67). Median prostatic volume before VTP was 35 mL (30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41)(42)(43)(44)(45)(46). Median PSA before RP was 5.9 (3.2-7.9) ng/mL.…”
Section: A N U S C R I P Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A C C E P T E D ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 22 RALP vs RRP (n=315) <1 pad changed per/d No pad 84% 72% Wallerstedt et al 28 , RALP vs RRP (n=1360) No Pad 66% Haglind et al 24 , RALP VS RRP (n=2431) <1 pad 79 % Donovan et al 29 RRP/RALP/LRP (n=553) <1 pad/day 70% Salvage Prostatectomy Leonardo et al 9 LRP (n=13) after HIFU No pad 69% Lawrentschuk et al 13 RRP (n=15) after HIFU No pad 60% Orré et al 30 RARP (n=7) after brachytherapy No pad 57% Linares Espinos et al 23 LRP/RARP (n=12/16) after ERBT (n=6), brachytherapy (n=3) VTP (n=1), HIFU (n=6), cryotherapy…”
Section: A N U S C R I P Tmentioning
confidence: 99%