2018
DOI: 10.1155/2018/2132781
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oncological and Functional Evaluation of Open Conservation Surgery for Hypopharyngeal Cancer with/without Reconstruction

Abstract: Objectives Oncological and functional results of open conservation surgery for hypopharyngeal cancer have been desired. Methods We performed a chart review of 33 patients with hypopharyngeal cancer who underwent open conservation surgery. Oncological and functional results were evaluated in surgery with primary closure (Group A) and surgery with reconstruction (Group B). Postoperative functions were evaluated by interval to resumption of oral intake, Functional Outcome Swallowing Scale (FOSS) and Communication… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A functioning contra-lateral “crico-arytenoid unit” was paramount when considering LPS, 1,18 while the N status of the patients’ disease generally did not influence the type of LPS surgery undertaken. Furthermore, it was paramount for LPS candidates to have a good pulmonary functional reserve, motivation, and psychological support to ensure that they could cope with the potentially prolonged period possibly required for swallowing rehabilitation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A functioning contra-lateral “crico-arytenoid unit” was paramount when considering LPS, 1,18 while the N status of the patients’ disease generally did not influence the type of LPS surgery undertaken. Furthermore, it was paramount for LPS candidates to have a good pulmonary functional reserve, motivation, and psychological support to ensure that they could cope with the potentially prolonged period possibly required for swallowing rehabilitation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The swallowing function was evaluated regarding a functional outcome swallowing scale (FOSS). 1 Symptom criteria ranged from stage 0 (normal function and asymptomatic) to stage V (nonoral feeding for all nutrition). Swallowing function at or above stage III was considered satisfactory because patients could swallow orally, and aspiration was avoided.…”
Section: Outcome Assessment and Follow-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A precondition for LPS is a functioning contralateral "cricoarytenoid unit," whereas N status does not seem to matter. 26,29 We further suggest that patients selected for surgery should have good pulmonary functional reserves, motivation, and access to psychological support to ensure that they can cope with prolonged swallowing rehabilitation. 3 The patient's systemic condition is another factor to consider when deciding for or against LPS.…”
Section: Np324mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although numerous case series have examined HPC patients treated by LPS, 9,11,12,26,[30][31][32][33][34] not all reported functional outcomes (Table 3). Nevertheless, the available data suggest that most patients have satisfactory swallowing function.…”
Section: Np324mentioning
confidence: 99%