2022
DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000009479
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Oncologic Safety of Staged Pre-Pectoral Implant Reconstruction Following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: a Mean 9-Year Follow-Up.”

Abstract: repectoral reconstruction following therapeutic nipple-sparing mastectomy has been widely accepted as a better alternative to submuscular reconstruction. 1-3 Although short-term oncologic safety and advantages of prepectoral reconstruction are well documented, long-term oncologic follow-up more than 5 years has not been reported. 4,5 We previously reported our experience on the aesthetic/functional outcomes of therapeutic/prophylactic nipple-sparing mastectomy and prepectoral staged expander/implant reconstruc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a study from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Database looking including 39 216 patients reported a higher risk of EC (HR 3.74) in women under 50 years of age 12 . Although, currently is less common to prescribe 5 or 10 years of tamoxifen treatment for hormone receptor positive postmenopausal BC women with due to other preferred treatment strategies including aromatase inhibitors for 5 or more years, switch therapies with both aromatase inhibitors and tamoxifen, there are some premenopausal patients that are still candidates for tamoxifen treatment and also it is important to take in account that in basic resources settings tamoxifen is still the first choice of treatment in both pre and postmenopausal women 49,50 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a study from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Database looking including 39 216 patients reported a higher risk of EC (HR 3.74) in women under 50 years of age 12 . Although, currently is less common to prescribe 5 or 10 years of tamoxifen treatment for hormone receptor positive postmenopausal BC women with due to other preferred treatment strategies including aromatase inhibitors for 5 or more years, switch therapies with both aromatase inhibitors and tamoxifen, there are some premenopausal patients that are still candidates for tamoxifen treatment and also it is important to take in account that in basic resources settings tamoxifen is still the first choice of treatment in both pre and postmenopausal women 49,50 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 Although, currently is less common to prescribe 5 or 10 years of tamoxifen treatment for hormone receptor positive postmenopausal BC women with due to other preferred treatment strategies including aromatase inhibitors for 5 or more years, switch therapies with both aromatase inhibitors and tamoxifen, there are some premenopausal patients that are still candidates for tamoxifen treatment and also it is important to take in account that in basic resources settings tamoxifen is still the first choice of treatment in both pre and postmenopausal women. 49,50 EC is the most common gynecologic malignancy in the Western world and the most important risk factor is estrogen exposure (endogenous or exogenous) such as nulliparity, early menarche and late menopause, obesity and estrogen medication. 51 Western women as well are those at a higher risk of tamoxifen associated EC according to our and other studies results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 5-year recurrence rate among women who underwent SSM and NSM in our population was respectively 7.8% and 13.3%. Despite the high variability in median follow-up lengths, in the literature recurrence rate of SSM and NSM range respectively from 0% to 14.3% [15,[25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36] and from 0% to 10.3% [25,32,34,35,[37][38][39].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this report, 1 Drs. Salibian and Harkness update their 2016 work 2 on “staged suprapectoral expander/implant reconstruction without acellular dermal matrix following nipple-sparing mastectomy.” In that article, they reported their experience with creating “thick flaps” in nipple-sparing mastectomy and challenged whether allograft was necessary to achieve good cosmetic outcomes in this clinical setting.…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%