2015
DOI: 10.1002/hed.24191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oncologic safety of facial artery myomucosal flaps in oral cavity reconstruction

Abstract: Neck dissection with preservation of the facial artery and vein does not alter the rate of regional recurrences, confirming the oncologic safety of myomucosal flaps in oral cavity reconstruction. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38: E1200-E1202, 2016.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(31 reference statements)
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The oncological safety of t-FAMMIF-SMG local chimeric flap may be based on the current state of knowledge using these involved flaps independently. According to this, the facial artery preservation during elective neck dissection in clinical N0 cervical lymph node status does not compromise oncological safety 29. However, in cases of clinical-stage N+ with a therapeutic neck dissection requirement, the significance of preserving facial artery in relation to oncological safety has not yet been established 3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The oncological safety of t-FAMMIF-SMG local chimeric flap may be based on the current state of knowledge using these involved flaps independently. According to this, the facial artery preservation during elective neck dissection in clinical N0 cervical lymph node status does not compromise oncological safety 29. However, in cases of clinical-stage N+ with a therapeutic neck dissection requirement, the significance of preserving facial artery in relation to oncological safety has not yet been established 3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to this, the facial artery preservation during elective neck dissection in clinical N0 cervical lymph node status does not compromise oncological safety. 29 However, in cases of clinical-stage N+ with a therapeutic neck dissection requirement, the significance of preserving facial artery in relation to oncological safety has not yet been established. 3 With regard to technical aspects, cervical lymph node clearance around SMG and relatively large caliber vessels of the pedicle is well feasible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As an axial flap, FAMM flap can be raised as either superior or inferior based on facial artery 9. Oncologic safety of preserving facial vessels in N0 neck and use of FAMM flap have been well described by Ferrari et al10…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,8 As an axial flap, FAMM flap can be raised as either superior or inferior based on facial artery. 9 Oncologic safety of preserving facial vessels in N0 neck and use of FAMM flap have been well described by Ferrari et al 10 Local flaps commonly used include submental, nasolabial, and infra hyoid flaps. Node positivity in neck risks the use of submental flap for reconstruction.…”
Section: Surgical Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%