2017
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msw295
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oncogenes without a neighboring tumor-suppressor gene are more prone to amplification

Abstract: Focal copy number gains or losses are important genomic hallmarks of cancer. The genomic distribution of oncogenes and tumor-suppressor genes (TSG) in relation to focal copy number aberrations is unclear. Our analysis revealed that the mean distance of TSGs from oncogenes was significantly shorter than that of noncancer genes, suggesting that oncogenes and TSGs tend to be in close physical proximity in the human genome. Such relationship was conserved in mouse and drosophila. Pan-cancer analysis using data fro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, longer-lived species may have more complex regulatory networks that mediate the balance between cellular proliferative potential and necessary checks on tumor progression. In the human and mouse genomes, oncogenes without a tumor suppressor gene at a nearby genomic location were found more likely to become amplified ( Wu et al. 2017 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, longer-lived species may have more complex regulatory networks that mediate the balance between cellular proliferative potential and necessary checks on tumor progression. In the human and mouse genomes, oncogenes without a tumor suppressor gene at a nearby genomic location were found more likely to become amplified ( Wu et al. 2017 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, longer-lived species may have more complex regulatory networks that mediate the balance between cellular proliferative potential and necessary checks on tumor progression. In the human and mouse genomes, oncogenes without a tumor suppressor gene at a nearby genomic location were found more likely to become amplified (Wu et al 2017). Oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes were found to be among the evolutionarily oldest sets of genes in eukaryotes, associated with the timing of the origins of both multicellular and vertebrate life (Makashov et al 2019); this is consistent with our observation that oncogenes are highly conserved at the sequence level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2b, c ). The gained proximity to the POGs from 3q arm in hystricomorphs and from 19p13.11 in sciuromorphs might have allowed nullification of tumorigenic effects though co-deletion (or co-silencing) or co-amplification (or co-activation) of co-positioned TSG and POG clusters, as proposed elsewhere 45 .
Fig.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Examples include co-amplification of POGs at 8p11–12 36 , at 14q13.3 37 40 and co-deletion of TSGs at 8p22 41 and at 3p21.31 42 44 regions. On the contrary, many other POGs exhibit linear proximity to TSGs under an evolutionary constraint to nullify tumorigenic effect through co-amplification or co-deletion of oncogenes and tumour-suppressor genes 45 . We hypothesise that certain genomic rearrangements of POG and TSG clusters can endow cancer resistance to some mammals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%